anarchyoftaste
AnarchyOfTaste
anarchyoftaste

Legally, you are in the right, no doubt. But ethically? I’m not so sure.

Alternate headline:

Maybe he didn’t agree with it? Maybe the thought of having a medical doctor come between his love for his wife didn’t really agree with him? Maybe he feels like he knows her better than the doctor does? Maybe, just maybe he could be right about this, and this is actually a total grey area that feminist theory doesn’t

How charitable of you.

I have some really difficult and conflicting feelings about this.

Yup. same story here. Almost every article of clothing I ever purchased myself, or had purchased for me as a minor, came off a sale’s rack. This despite the fact that my parent’s income would put them in the upper middle class. I’ve never looked sharp. I still don’t, and I really don’t care to start. I got teased, but

Yup. I also hate when people call other people “trash.”

For you yeah, that makes sense,

You think that’s a good way to do it? Maybe you’re right.

Not every single domestic issue.

I know you aren’t joking. I also don’t think your strategy is a bad one from your perspective. I just think it is worth reminding you and everyone else that doign so is contributing to a pretty crappy political phenomenon.

All the “I really don’t feel so great voting for her BUT...” comments make me ill.

I know Nobody Cares About My Fucking errrr opinion, but I vote for Bai Ling.

Umm yeah, dude. Can you read? I’m justifying the bitter critique of cultures. When I nod my head along with Southern Man, it’s in agreement.

“Nobody’s criticizing their request to sit next to a man.”

That fact that an ideology is weird, and not yours, isn’t really a reason not to criticize it.

They are republicans. Both the Pauls are republicans. They are libertarianish, but you only ever hear about them because they won, and therefore, they can actually make noise in Washington, score TV appearances, sell books, etc. They only won because they are republicans. Why is this so hard to understand?

The libertarian party has never endorsed the Pauls, AFAIK. So what exactly are you talking about here?

There absolutely are!

Most progressives are against the USA’s use of hell-fire missiles to kill “enemy combatants” in area populated with civilians. But they still generally support a president who does just that.