Nobody is ignoring documents, because there are no documents to ignore. I'm simply saying that a LACK of submission does not mean that they have changed their position WHATSOEVER.

A lack of a comment to the US Copyright office is hardly a reversal of their previous publicly stated position. You better provide some better information before you start accusing people of lying.

Let me point out the headline of the article.

[consumerist.com]

Yes, but Microsoft doesn't want to throw you in jail for modifying the windows theme on your own computer.

I'll continue for you:

"They don't have leaders in the sense of General Motors, but there's an slight ethos that sometimes guides what some of them, in general, do."

^^ Yep, all this.

Here is an example you might understand better.

^ I totes agree with this...

Didn't you hear? After pressure from the entertainment industry, the feds are cracking down on piracy.

While im sure the political connections and guns help, It also helps that they aren't making millions of dollars off of copyrighted material.

Interesting.

Call me an idiot, but how can someone reach supersonic speeds through free fall? I thought there was a thing called terminal velocity.

^ This comment.

That makes me a sad panda.

Ha,

Best use of a blackberry that i've seen in a very long time.

Being that i've experienced this type of therapy (I had physical therapy on my knee) I can say that I wouldn't put this anywhere near my junk. It literally shocks your muscles into contracting, and can be a bit painful, and that was on a quadricep, which isn't exactly at the same sensitivity level.

Yeah, but imagine the press on that one "Cops punch woman in the face for blocking McDonalds drive through"