I’m waiting for the reviews on Hogwarts to be the same way. People who oppose JK are already starting to user review bomb the game when its not even out. I wish people who didn’t agree with certain things would just shut the fuck up and let people enjoy what they want to enjoy.

This is not a device aimed at people with disabilities. I’d say its aimed a people spending $200 on a Scuf or Xbox Elite controller more than anything.

Nintendo’s online is fucking trash. It would be one thing to require it for online coop or actual PvP/Multiplayer, but for trading and raids? Fuck that.

I mean there are reviewers who docked the game for the scene so he’s not totally off base, just lazy blaming the woke mob instead of going after these particular reviewers

We can only hope he gets permanently banned so you stop giving them publicity. Waiting who am I kidding, you’ll still report on what they eat for lunch.

No they weren’t going to tell people, probably hoping people still getting into the game spend a little cash to unlock her early.

Yeah I’m not supporting nor playing this shit game. Locking heroes that will inevitably be OP at release behind a paywall is dogshit. Just leave the BP to be for cosmetics.

I honestly don’t get why I keep coming back to this site. I get that Zach writes shit articles to fulfil his overlords demands, but to spoil a game after saying No Spoilers? Fuck you

Yeah it is dogshit. New heroes tend to be OP from my experience with OW, and if you don’t pay to get it, or don’t grind stupid long hours you are fucked. Some games have handled this slightly better by giving you challenges to unlock it freely ala COD with the guns in their BP, but it still really sucks to lock…

lol NASA could have been risk averse with peoples lives but instead pushed on. Helluva time to be careful when there is no one on board and using a bunch of leftover parts.

Based on everything this blogger has posted about COD leads me to believe they chose the wrong person to review it. This was one of the better campaigns COD has had since the early BO/ OG MW2

Agreed. Its not going to win any awards but it was entertaining and had variety to it.

If it is anything like the GotG game then I’m all in.

Holy shit this site continues to amaze me with how far it has fallen. You are mad a game didn’t make a character horny because his home land was under attack and the people around him were dying?

Mike was the last of the good writers at Kotaku. I always felt like he was sharing something special with readers and not pushing some agenda.

I haven’t looked at numbers lately, but didn’t the PS3 outsell Xbox even with the botched launch and hard to program for architecture?

I bought InFamous because the demo was so good, and I loved it. InFamous 2 was awesome and improved so much on the first one. Didn’t really care for the one that was set in Seattle and launched right after the PS4.

I don’t get why you think they need a gaming event to announce a release date. They can easily do one of their own State of Play events and show a 2-3 minute teaser with the release date at the end. Every gaming publication will have a story up in 2 minutes with the release date.

The game looks ROUGH. Frames were dropping and the screen was tearing. Movement and shooting looked off. I know they have 9ish months to clean it up, but based on their track record with Fallout I have low expectations that the bugs will be cleaned up by launch. I hope they get it right but I definitely was…

The Peter & May connection, and the Peter & Ock connection alone are worth the price of admission.