NOT PERIOD-APPROPRIATE.

Although I really love Eleanor Holmes Norton in this.

Anna Camp is quite good. Her storyline is pretty much paint-by-numbers, but she does good work with it. As do most of the cast, I think. It’s not a bad show, just too on-the-nose.

Yes, the show starts in December 1969 and New Year’s hits a few episodes in. It’s really a 70s show. As the characters themselves repeatedly comment.

I was referring to Luke.

He displayed poor lightsaber safety habits.

Yes, Abe could have family money. Rose could have family money (though that’s less likely, with Abe offering to buy half of the apartment without apparently consulting his wife). All I’m saying is that I think they’re living a little rich for a faculty salary. And Abe’s office is too big.

Actually, I would say that this is probably the only show about a comedian worth watching.

$120,000 is nice, but not in lawyer/doctor/plastics executive/sweatshop owner territory.

Bread and Circuses: The Motion Picture

Actually, I would be totally down with a feature-length remake of “Patterns of Force”. It would be nothing if not timely.

Nope. The days when leftists were smart enough to support a popular front against fascism are long gone. I think leftists would rather see actual fascism take over. Like the right-wingers, they find the endless compromises of democratic politics to be beneath them.

Perhaps they should take a cue from how liberals are reacting to this.

As someone who is neither part of the contemporary art scene nor high society, I disagree. I don’t know how anyone could not find the scene with the noisy art exhibit undercutting the passive-aggressive interchange between Christian and Ann funny. You don’t have to be steeped in art theory to understand the scene…

Actually, ending film subsidies is probably a good idea. But if this were really about the welfare of women, he would put the money towards, let’s say, sexual assault prevention programs?

Not everyone gets their vowels for free, you know.

Yeah, I don’t think I could be in a relationship with someone my wife didn’t like.

But that still takes a lot of communication and respect from everyone involved.

I can’t remember a poly relationship that I would call “unequal and exploitative”, though I’ve seen many I would deem unwise. I have seen many unequal monogamous relationships, however. If you want to condemn “unequal and exploitative”, stick to that. Otherwise you’re just being smug and judgy.

I know a poly... group that is more or less four adults raising a single child. Sometimes being poly actually pays dividends in the free time dept.