What changed your mind?

Lol pulse wasn’t done by a christian though.

They weren’t, it was canceled.

Also if it wasnt funded by the government, which it likely wasnt, hopefully, then it’s a non issue. The government generally allows it’s schools to host religious nonsense. For instance, my college had many religious clubs that met on campus.

“In what meaningful way would your poly-centric world be different from an anarchy with no laws at all?”

Anarchy doesnt mean no laws, it means no rulers. What I described is one conception of anarchy, so how does it differ from anarchy? it doesnt.

Also I dont think the individuals will sign extradition like treaties, I…

Well if you don’t think it would work, care to explain how?

Poly centric law could work in a number of ways. Either as simple as something like panarchism, where multiple ‘state like’ entities govern the same geography, and you may pick and choose which you would prefer to be governed with, with some set of arbitration rules for when there are conflicts between people governed…

Surprisingly, thats not an argument of any sort.
Also, anarchism really isn;t that edgy.

All things are nothing to me, is the title of the introduction to the 1844 book “The Ego and His Own”

“There is not a one-size-fits all solution to all problems”

If people are too irrational to be trusted to make decisions for themselves, then how is it that those very same people can be trusted to choose people to make decisions on their behalf? How is it that the people who are chosen to make decisions on the behalf of others can be fully trusted to make those decisions and…

Yeah but I also bash trump... It’s not like I’m a republican or something. I’ve already told you I was an anarchist, do you expect anarchists to support Hillary?

We don’t agree, I am against this law. Sorry for any confusion I may have caused.
Also regulations are stupid. I ignore tons of regulations where I work, and I have to to get anything done. It should REALLY say something when a common union tactic of protest/bargaining is to follow ALL of the regulations and rules,…

If you insist on reducing everything to absolutes like ‘The law is just an opinion with a gun’ or ‘taxation is theft’ (which you haven’t said directly but I feel confident you’d agree with), then you are deliberately overlooking the troubles of actually existing in a real world with other flawed human beings who may…

I’ve never heard of anarchism being associated with neckbeards, thats my confusion, also it’s a non argument. I have a neck, and no beard whatsoever. Not that it’s relevant.

Another example of a logical fallacy. Every heath authority has it’s own schedule, regulations and review cycles. To flatly state that the “FDA Is holding them up” is a non-factual statement without any data to support it.

Anarchism is associated with neckbeards? Wot? I thought that was gamergaters or whatever. But I guess it’s just easy to dismiss people you disagree with because they grow hair on parts of their body you disapprove of or whatever.

Also body shaming isn’t really a good argument. But okay.

I wasn’t hiding them, my name and my avatar are highly suggestive of my views.

I am neither a liberal ( in any sense of the word, in the the way conservatives use it, in the way communists use it, in the way that classical liberals might want it used.) nor am I a feminist.

Are you against all regulation? Any justification for why you are against THIS regulation of the porn industry, ultimately, can be used against other regulations.

Thats my point.

If you are unwilling to demonstrate the principles on which your ideology is founded thats fine. You’re under no obligation to humor me, of course.

But I have to wonder why it doesn’t bother you that your ideology is so baseless, built on quicksand, and yet you and your kind, liberal feminists, are so passionate about…

Which logical fallacy is that? Pray tell.

Because it seems to be plainly obvious that laws and regulations involve control over your body. The “It’s very simple.” part is me being snide.