i was kind of annoyed about all this til the iran thing. that absolutely made my day....

“having short or long hair doesn’t define you as a woman.”

the taxpayer is paying for her hormone therapy for the same reason the taxpayer is paying for a schizophrenic prisoner’s seroquel or a diabetic prisoner’s insulin. does that help?

wow, thanks. i see things much more clearly now

well, im pretty sure you would seem more fun after ive had a couple....

no, it’s just *your* logic that swings back there. long hair is not necessary for her to present as female. they are specifically stating that she is required to adhere to male grooming standards. the point is that the doj cant decide whether it wants to treat her as male or female. which “swings back” to my original…

ive been waiting for an opportunity to answer a question with a question: if she was schizophrenic, would it be cruel and unusual punishment to deny her any part of her medically recommended treatment?

i was hoping someone would educate me on the difference. please go on....

you must be loads of fun at dinner parties...

so if she was schizophrenic, she shouldnt be treated according to the recommended treatment for schizophrenia? your tax dollars shouldnt pay for that either?

“Trans women are not women.”

thats about the response i expected

well, that settles it, i guess. i stand corrected

you asserted that the length of her hair is not part of her treatment. you are simply wrong. presenting as female is most definitely part of a trans womans treatment and i wouldnt argue that point with you any more than id argue the color of the sky with you. if you think its “completely consistent” that the doj gives…

how you could read that study and not conclude that they dont belong in a prison in the first place, idk

but shes allowed cosmetics. its almost like you didnt even read before commenting....

in general, military grooming standards for females have nothing to do with length.

trolling every reasonable female?

all you said was that you werent trolling. so you only answered part of the question. so if im to assume that youre truly ignorant, then my answer is to point you to the google machine, because it’s the year 2015 and i don’t feel it’s my job to educate people like you anymore than i feel it’s my job to educate people…

ok, lance. thanks for sharing your concern