Two problems with that:

If it’s missing words like above, it’s because they’re wrapping names in Amazon affiliate links, which are stripped by some adblockers.

Oh, it was absolutely a win for him, but there’s no getting around the fact that ultimately Blizzard got exactly what they wanted - beaucoup bucks.

In order for that analogy to make sense, this guy would have to have lost something by doing this. I think it’s pretty clear that he made money and grew his business, so . . . not so much?

And it’s not like the amount of money he gave Blizzard will even register to them. $15k is like less than 0.00068% of their NET…

I wouldn’t say completely counterproductive the stunt netted Quin a lot of eyeballs on his YouTube and stream, which in turn got him more attention, more subscribers and more money.  Prior to that he mostly did PoE content so most people outside of that community had no idea who he was.

Do not mistake Quin for a mindless whale. What he put in Immortal he received tenfold in the form of viewership (and thus $$$).

That’s overwhelmingly not true. I can’t find the research RN, but the five percent that did regret were basically women from slut-shaming cultures.

I didn’t know she draws her entire face on.  That’s a whole lot of makeup for one person.  I mean, she’s free to use all the makeup she wants, I’m just startled.  I guess I’ve never seen an up-close picture.  Now that I have, I don’t need to do so again.

i know your mom does about not having one.

this was allegedly during the time that she was working as an escort.

It’s incredible how many of you have to resort to lies to bolster yourselves. I don’t care about Johnny Depp. Or Amber Heard, tbf. I care about victims of domestic violence and facts and evidence. Y’all should try that on some time. Much easier than having to make up lies about strangers on the internet. It’s also…

1) False- Johnny’s team submitted audio that had been edited to remove his threats and beatings, as well as manipulating what amber said to make it look worse. The UK judge had the court techs examine them and they were found to have been edited.

I .. am calm? Now you’re going to make up how I’m feeling and act like that’s a fact? What’s with y’all making up so many lies about people you don’t know on the internet?

They had to edit the audio because the Virginia trial didn’t allow any audio that had voices of people who could not testify.

Wonder how the judge will react to her doing exactly what the jury in her case found to be defamation, again, before the case is even settled. You know, jez there’s a 50/50 chance that Johnny is the the one telling the truth and the dogged holding on to the idea that a woman can’t lie is getting to be misogynistic…

The trial was about telling malicious lies not about abuse.

I think she’s beyond “dunzo”.

This. Except that many simply deny that a man can be a victim of a woman at all, so it isn’t all hypocrisy. It is intentionally cruel .

Did you even read the verdict in full? Maybe you should decline jury duty if you are ever called, for the sake of our peers.

We all know that?