Depends on if the only enforcement agency (Congress) that has the power to demand testimony under oath cares.

Sure. But there's an actual crime that has been committed with enough evidence.

The whole "Trump committed obstruction of justice" thing is weird, as he blatantly did.

Wait, it's out? I thought most movies were released on Friday-ish unless there's a holiday. I expect most of the movie-going audience also believes that.

Ares should not have been in the movie at all. It felt like the movie was building up to Diana realizing that men are flawed but need inspiration and hope to become better…

Huh — never looked that deeply before, but the world of Watchmen could really use some "Caution: Wet Surface" signs to make sure people don't walk through giant pools of blood.

She also listed multiple goals and benefits to passing the law in the same speech. To bring it back to the main topic — the Democrats, by virtue of having a public process and a clear defined goal, were able to state what their bill did, how it did it, and what the goal was. However, because the process was public,…

Nah — she was saying the "good stuff" (lifetime caps on costs, removal of pre-existing conditions, Medicaid expansion, subsidies, etc) in the bill was being overshadowed by the highlighting of the "bad stuff" (tax increases, mandates).

"We have to pass the bill, so that you can find out what is in it — away from the fog of the controversy." -Nancy Pelosi, three months after the bill was posted and being actively debated in Congress.

The Democrats offered a lot of policies and proposals aimed at working class voters and received the majority of the working class vote.

I am depressed and amused at how much attention "Ask Republicans what their health care plan does" is creating.

The only hope for this movie is if the location continuity errors are amusing enough!

Funny story — the women Senators used to be barred from the Senate swimming pool because one (or more) of the male Senators liked to swim naked.

This is why they tell people to hold signing ceremonies and not "Woo we got a bill out of the House without reading it!" ceremonies.

The commitment to testify under oath is under a continuous audit and has been for the last ten years.

He can't get charged with perjury and then "sentenced and convicted". It's impeachment or nothing, and that rests heavily on the controlling party in both chambers of Congress.

I was going to go with "Highlander 2: The Quickening" as it was the first movie on the list I had watched. And is amazing in many of the ways that bad movies are amazing.

If things collapse to a degree where another election is necessary, Labour would probably do better. The out-party has significant advantages running against an incumbent party with a non-incumbent leader.

1. Exit polls are usually off, but if the results don't change everyone thinks they were accurate even if the margin is more off than a bad exit poll in a close race.

Anyways, remember that time that Trump left the Paris climate deal, and started off the speech by talking about a "terrorist attack" that turned out to be a casino robbery?