Yup, thinking the same thing. You put yourself in a position to be lucky. Eventually, you’ll hit on some franchise players. “Just draft better” isn't a realistic approach for, like, 25 of the NBA teams.

If that happens, Hinkie will have been right.

Is it wrong that I feel Hinkie was right and that we’ll ultimately see this being copied more and more?

I feel like the opposite is actually more true. More often, ESPN and the like hype players who killed it in college who YOU ABSOLUTELY KNOW will not be good NBA players.

Yes, there has to be. Think about it. What happens if you call a balk with no one on base? Nothing.

This dude needs resignation letter advice from Bill Belichick.

Except that's not true.

That premise is dumb as shit. If I get a pay decrease at work from $60,000 to $55,000, does that mean I’m paying $5,000 to work there?

Definitely if they don't know much about the player or soccer. So yes—-was thinking same thing.

Pierre Lebrun knows a lot more about hockey than you or me, and he thinks 2 to 3 games. 5 max.

Black?

He's technically right, but what he's missing is that you could say the same for non-top-ranked men. The super stars carry the league. Nothing new there, though—-several sports could say that.

Yeah! I mean, why even watch sports at all, since it has no actual impact on your life!

This is why big network analyses are bullshit.

Not a fan of the magic turf that only screws you up and not your opponent.

But even that wouldn't be true. It's untrue no matter what they meant.

Racists...

Plus, he wouldn’t have even been the first to do that either. Ditka won with the Bears in 63 before then winning as a coach in 85.

Damn straight. If you don’t love Cam and his great smile, you’re a fucking racist-ass racist racist! You tell ‘em!

I’m kind of a Cam Newton hater, but this was some strange-ass musing. The hell is wrong with you?