I guess I don’t understand why you would think this comparison means anything? The switch is cheaper out of the gate first, it’s a handheld that most Japanese markets will sell since that’s what’s most prominent in that region with dedicated consoles like the PS4 on decline in general.

You obviously haven’t been paying attention to crimson and amd’s drivers for the past year. Their drivers have given the RX 400 series and older cards better frames in a lot of games. Their driver improvements have given me a 8-10% increase in most games.

Right good idea to show people deals on a gaming laptop that’s a dual core with hyper-threading. Totally a good deal for gaming./s

Right good idea to show people deals on a gaming laptop that’s a dual core with hyper-threading. Totally a good deal…

The thing is most of those outside of Vita, and 3DS are stationary systems. 3DS and vita don’t have great browser experiences because of factors like screen, touch controls, and just the quality of the browser in general.

That is....you’re opinion, that release schedule that we have for switch is actually factual, not opinion.

Jesus are you for real? It had some great game son it, but took way to long to obtain those, and had nothing in between those releases. The same thing looks like is happening with the switch only difference is the hardware looks well designed and focused.

Yea in development and some not even past sketches according to Suda.

Download speeds you definatley hit a sore spot for me when it comes to patching console games. It needs to be on par with steam,origin. Psn actually currently has more sales this past generation than steam has on their games. They are on week 2 right now where titles are 70-80% off with PS+ discounts that stack. I…

I mentioned Doom, Overwatch, and said games that are PC based which You included in your last comment are a plus for PC. But Farcry primal still uses shitty uplay, no one is playing Call of duty on PC, let alone Infinite Warfare. Battlefield is PC based because of Frostbite among other games. Battlefield, overwatch,…

Well glad you enjoy PC, when it works and the game runs well, and doesn’t have server/netcode issues I enjoy it as well.

Such a intelligent post.

I guess the year 2015-2016 passed you by on bad ports?

Been PC gaming since MS 95. Though you are right there are genre’s on PC that they have in droves like Moba’s, dungeon crawlers, rts, and simulation. The issue is they all very in quality and a lot of them early access which is a crap shoot. Most diverse games that people bring up are part of early access and end up…

No didn’t have time as I was writing while doing server maintenance from remote access. Once I closed the session you only get like so much time to go back and do edits on kotaku.

You mean pay 250$ for something that plays actually more than your laptop does? Maybe you have access to more smaller flash games and such. But you wont have access to the giant library of games coming from Japan.

Yea, your right an expansion to a 12 year old game is great?

All of those minus Civ 6 on console. Yea guess you didn’t read about the street fighter issues on PC? As in really bad security issues that made your pc open to hack? And didn’t read about the player count on PC for Gears being non-existent. I said nothing about age I was about constancy.

I disagree with the headline 100%. There are so many things that actually makes PC the worst place to play. The only thing that comes to mind are some of the better ports we got this year with Hitman, Rise of the Tomb Raider. Then theres cross play with games like Rocket League, Gears, and maybe include street fighter…

Yes it will actually. If Sony’s is holding true to how they’ve been planning their division outline we will have it revealed in 2019 with a late fall launch.

Guess you Didn’t pay attention to Uncharted 4.