Actually the collectors edition has been sold out for weeks. And a lot of people who played the alpha and the beta have had nothing but positive things to say. So it sounds like it will do alright.

Hey,

The reason it seems and look like I’m jumping around is the Wii U, and mainly NIntendo have had vast issues in the past that range from hardware they choose, to enclosed development, to OS issues, third party relations.

Where did Sony approach third party developer’s? Most of the people they went to were first party developers. And they do not have a long standing history of shitting on third party developers and causing issues. Nintendo is the one who needs to talk to people Internally and externally. Nintendo has a bad history with…

Here are some things you should consider:

What? No, they didn’t? Sony actually had Mark Cerny go around from Japan, UK, US, and Europe to get developer input on what they wanted for Memory, GPU, CPU storage ect to make the best games possible. They asked openly what they didn’t like in PS3 hardware, and majority of them complained about POWER PC architecture…

Port’s like frozenbyte are on everything and their engine runs on pretty much everything. Please show me a recent Criterion game? Those games were contracted by Nintendo as in Nintendo was paying to have those ported not EA, Ubisoft.

I wasn’t able to put this in my last post in time:

I’m not going to get into fanboy territory which is what your doing in the above paragraph, I was literally just talking new IP’s that’s all. I could have added stuff like Sunset over drive, Scalebound, quantum break, Ori and the blind forest, cuphead, Recore, among many others. What new IP’s not tied to any legacy…

You bringing up metacritic really has nothing to do sometimes with how a game performs. Case in point Starwars:battlfront was panned by a lot of people, and is sitting at 72 on metacritic, yet has sold over 12 Million copies.

Your last part is pure opinion. Nintendo’s issue is they have relied on only their first party IP’s. And when they start a generation, you can predict mostly that we will get a smash, amrio kart, mario 3D type game, a zelda etc.

If you can’t understand the difference in documentation for developers on SKD’s and GAME engines then I guess were done here.

Outside of exclusive deals Nintendo makes with a select few of games like shovel knight(there’s an actual amiibo now). They don’t do a good job promoting games. Platinum Games made coupel exclusives for them and they did all but shit for a premier studio. Bayonetta 2 sold like shit and so did W101. Now they went and…

That’s what they have been doing on PS3? All the big AAA releases have been more on PS3 because it has a much larger library at the moment.

Your partially right. And the evidence with Ubisoft pulling their games from Wii U would prove that. The issue is that it’s costly to develop on older tech unless it’s outsourced to a cheaper third party Joe/shmoe studio.

Your partially right on the over inflated budget’s during ps2 to PS3 era. But now that we have smaller indie/PC developer’s bringing their games over to console that is not a good excuse. There are so many Japanese games that have come out and are coming out with very small teams attached. Hell look at the output…

Well Twilight Princess HD coming to Wii U. Same for couple other;s on the virtual console.

The issue is Power PC architecture is gone, which is what the PS3 and Wii U run. The biggest difference is Nintendo’s documentation on their SKD’s. Which is why people like EA,(among their issue with EA Access), Activision won’t bring their next gen games over to it. It’s to much work for little gain, look at how…

Too bad some of those games like Pikmin 3 are out of print and have been out for almost over a year. Only way to buy them new is digital, or through a third party seller on amazon or ebay for 89.99.

Rocket league, Gauntlet, the walking dead season 2, transistor which was GOTY contender last year are trash?