Grave sins however arent the same as mortal sins nor the same as excommunication sins. They are only one step above venial sin (the slightest ones) the point is that it is not so different from pre marital sex
Grave sins however arent the same as mortal sins nor the same as excommunication sins. They are only one step above venial sin (the slightest ones) the point is that it is not so different from pre marital sex
The original sin thing is not properly explained in cathecism, it was never about a specific act but rather about our capacity as humans to use our conscience that separates us from animales. Adam and Eve werent particular names, they meant women and men
You would be wrong thinking that latín american priests are ultra conservative, the most liberal and radicals were from Latín América, check about liberation theology, those dudes make cool Pope look right wing, specially jesuits
Poor Pope, conservatives get angry at him when he reminds then that catholicism isnt about fitting their límites worldview and angry sense of superiority while liberals say he isnt liberal enough. I like what Fr James Martín SJ said:
Cut the Pope some slack, the guy needs a synod first, he cant just say what goles with catholic doctrine and what doesnt. Plus he has a specific agenda with specific topics, because he saw that everyone could agree in specific issues. Consider also that he is a jesuit, in this document he explicitly states that…
Depends onwhere you live, this pope is a jesuit and they tend to be súper OK with secular hay marriages, they mayor not recognize it as officially catholic but they know that not everyone is catholic. I swear that one priest at muy college wanted to organize a gay rally, he was into adoption and shit
Not grave sin, as grave as extra marital one, they are more in the dont do it unless it is absolutely necessary
Evento inside the church they have currents, in my city rich conservative people go to schools owned by the legionnaires of Christ while liberales hang with jesuits, divorced couples are welcomed there but not so much with the legionnaires and dont get me started in the Opus...
Well putting the White people in a single group would not be a good idea given that white people are from different groups and have different backgrounds from each other unlike other communities that have a common background and faced specific difficulties. Why not something like Scottish appreciation week or…
Yes but I mean that that projection needs to take into account several events that tend to attract a lot of viewership and assistance such as this years Copa America Centenario. Specially if they get to play against Brazil or Uruguay or even Mexico
Yes but in years in which you have competitions like the World Cup, the men’s team would attract more attention giving that it is a worldwide event seen by almost everybody. Or for example the special edition of Copa America that will take place in the US this year.
That projection may not be suitable unless it takes into consideration events like the world cup that generate a lot of revenue and happen every 4 years or Copa America which will take place in the US, it needs stationality
Depends, in Brazil it is quite important because they have never won it also because it is not an amateur competition because at that age the players are already in a team plus they can add three reinforcements of any age
I think latinos wont be sidelined as long as they arent casted as the latin dudes. Like Gael Garcia Bernal or Karla Souza
Based on what i read he isnt even favored by the majority of the republicans, he has a majority in places where republicans arent a majority mostly
What annoyed me the worst about the thing that happenes to Sansa was that it made zero sense to have her escape from so much stuff to make her end like that for no apparent reason. It was made out of pure shock value. I didnt like that at all
I agree with you at all except for point 3,4, letting ther experiences be shown even in a documentary wont make them dictate science, science dictates itself so there is no biggie if the pseudo documentary gets shown
The right thing to do is letting the film be shown, after all it is his damn film festival, and then let it be panned by the critic and the scientific community, being stupid is not an impediment to be shown, it is a film festival after all, just let everyone know how stupid this pseudo documentary is. I mean,…
But, for managing reasons, wouldnt the influx of more migrants make it more difficult ti find radicals?
Non proffits being the main point here