By the show's end, Barry will have destroyed so many lives that the only option will be to go for a Butterfly Effect ending and just have him travel back and abort himself.

I'm 99% certain it's gonna be Wally … but they really need to cut the mystery villain slog every year. It feels like it's just become a lazy way to avoid the question 'why don't they just kill the bad guy in episode 5?'

Why are you imposing grammar rules from Latin upon English?

We are talking about a Glee-reprise here … a show that sold timeshares up its own arse.

Here's an idea writers … if you're gonna put two main characters in a relationship together, just do it, and do, like, zero storylines about it. No drama; no wangst; no petty arguments; no jealousy subplots … nothing. Just two people together while they carry on doing whatever it is the show was supposed to be about…

You needed more than that to work out he was the bad guy of the season?

I really can't fathom how he was involved in those early seasons. Maybe after he became showrunner he started drinking/coking up … or stopped, but there wasn't a single piston on which that show was firing. They bodged every single character, flushed potentially awesome storylines down the toilet, brought in damn…

Snyder actually made a couple of good/great films before turning out the dross… Buck is more like the faecal Midas.

I also tend to enjoy episodes which focus on one or two characters within an ensemble. Especially with Game of Thrones, it can seem quite underwhelming when an hour of television feels glacial because you end up only getting 8 minutes of movement for around 6 or 7 different storylines/locations.

They can only review the episodes that Netflix make available to them, and they clearly state here how many episodes were viewed? So exactly what do you want? For them to wait until we've all seen the show ourselves and compose a review based on a crowdsourced consensus of their readers?

It was good. But completely lost it towards the end of the season when they bought in an extremely lacklustre villain.

If they've hired Buck, they've already got a tool on the show … doubt retooling will help.

Well, considering the AV Club have seen the show, and we haven't … exactly on what basis do you envision people disagreeing?

Meh, I don't care if Monday's blue…

Almost every US sitcom devolves into soap opera eventually. It's an easier paycheck for everyone involved to just push the romance angle and make a few jokes about 'women be like…' and 'men be like…'.

They wouldn't be seen dead on this show anymore.

I think this show needs a moratorium on mortality more than anything. It's basically a show whose only trick is killing people and those deaths are basically the tentpoles over which a very thin canvas of storytelling is stretched. They should do a whole season where nobody dies and just work on their characters and…

"Sorry guys, it's pronounced 'Ne-VAR-da', not 'NE-vadder'. You're saying your state's name wrong!"

I'm sure she'll be devastated and rectify her personal appearance to suit your demands at once.

You mean when they reference the season 2 finale? I loved that that was just a throwaway line. Besides, you can't make good drama out of focussing on a five-year-old event when big stuff is happening in the now.