the x90 did not sell well, it was odd styling. but it was more daring that many manufacturers are today.
the x90 did not sell well, it was odd styling. but it was more daring that many manufacturers are today.
really wanted to buy one of these a few years ago. some great prices on used models.
if its not a RWD based platform then no thanks. i will never understand why Ford refuses to create a RWD platform that can be used beyond the mustang.
that too. its funny when i see a regular cab short bed 2wd S10 on the road and how small it was.
i miss the 1990s when everyone was making compact offroaders.
while visually the center tips are great, sometimes it complicates the installation of a hitch.
might not be able to see it as well due to the wider pillars on modern cars. but i agree with many of the comments here, the filler does look cheap looking
heir press release only talks about its drawbacks, particularly in terms of heat, and friction in the many tiny cylinders. That is“the biggest snag given a cylinder surface-to-volume ratio much higher than that of, say, a four-cylinder engine,”
i could not agree more. the whole prequel trilliogy was aweful to watch. especially natalie portmans acting
well said!
i agree, it was one of many nails in the coffin
the G8 and solstice was a shame to end. both were good platforms that really just went to waste. not the greatest, but there were very few cars like them on the market. and today the affordable 4cyl convert is still a tiny market. as is the large rear drive car not marketed as a luxury car.
to me the styling is just fine. though had it come out 5 years sooner in the US market, it might have looked a bit fresher. but the styling complaint when it first came out was over cried over and ruined an otherwise great vehicle
Saturn come back? i think this was a forgotten brand around 2006 or 2007 never mind today. though i always enjoy quirky brands, and would not mind the return of plastic panels. maybe today they can use better chemistry to allow tighter gaps
1980s Mustang SVO. in the 80s why would you pay more for a 4cyl mustang than a v8? Today its a unique oddity in a flood of v8 mustangs at shows.
destroying the EV1 was one of the biggest mistakes GM ever made. i get it, you do not want to have legal issues or provide parts. but hiring a lawyer to make buyers sign a waiver would have been cheaper than the damage to their image. plus these were really interesting cars, would have been fun to see around