Nah

I hear ya, I was just poking fun....I agree, if you can’t find a match, it’s toast. 

Well fuck... if YOU can’t find a match, then it’s destined to fail!

(disregard)

You can scale down the difficulty to match your skillset. 

I think what I wrote is taking away from my initial point, that I don’t think the “why” needs to be presented for the world to hear. I agree, he was smart to use the tools at his disposal. My sentiment was more to say that it just seemed a little to casual/calm during the 22 min Q/A but that’s my own personal view as…

Use the tools to your advantage sure, but now that the situation is over, the world doesn’t need a magnifying glass into the “why”.

Yeah lol. Her sleeping naked will increase YOUR desire for intimacy. And then you end up on the couch. *beenthere

Right but the rest of what he says is correct. Some kids act out for a reason, some don’t. We don’t know the inner workings, she might be rebellious, she might feel ignored, she might be abused. It’s not necessary for him to narrate it for us on camera. 

It’s just odd behavior all around. I get that social media helped him and that’s great but if my kid was missing, the last thing I would be doing is sitting in my gaming chair posting a 22 minute Q/A session and when she is found (alive!) my first instinct wouldn’t be to grab my camera and talk about the story that…

“He also noted that “there’s a long story to this,” which he plans on sharing in the future.”

Correct on both points. Jurors in these games can arrive at a decision at any time during your trials, both sides have a chance to hear their initial leaning and argue to sway them. It’s just a way to switch things up a bit from the usual formula and as mentioned before, to give the differences of English courts more…

You do realize that jurors often get questions before and during trials right? 

I disagree. He’s not a wordsmith but his point made perfect sense if you are willing to take a deep breath before replying to it. 

Bet you’re fun at parties.

Get some air. 

I agree with you despite all the kneejerk tightness you got as a reply to your statement. You weren’t attempting to be insulting but naturally, it’s read that way. If I am expecting a single person to join in a work meeting and my assistant refers to that person as “they”, it makes me do a double take to make sure I…

“I’m correct in having done so. Good for me.”

Brother, you seem to need another can of XTREME MOUNTAIN DEW. Crack one open and get YOUR HEAD IN THE GAME. 

Embarrassingly terrible.