aimlessz
AimlessZealot
aimlessz

That is only an issue if the suspect stands to benefit from the releasing of the footage. There’s no legal right to stop the victim from sharing evidence of a serious crime except in the event that it is seen as witness tampering and even then that’s only during the course of the trial, not before voir dire (such as

Chunks of the pattern may repeat, but if you copied the entire (infinite) sequence of tiles and moved your copy to line up one of those with one of the others, as you moved away from the overlapping chunk, you would notice that they begin to diverge and if you went far enough, the top layer and bottom layer would look

The problem I have with that is the idea of “politeness” for politeness-sake. Etiquette doesn’t exist in a vacuum. While we should seek to be civil to others, following “polite” standards like what you’re describing is endorsing the system you participate in. In that moment there’s no way to separate being “polite” to

It’s just you.

You’ve entirely misunderstood both my statement and the premise of modern law in most of the world. Your statement ‘The law is the ONLY legitimate path TO justice’ can be demonstrated as untrue with a fairly straightforward inquiry:

Justice does not actually have a process. The Law has a process. Even when following that process (for any given system of law) there is no guarantee that Fairness or Justice will arise. Individuals seeking Justice are not and cannot be limited to the remedies of the Law because the Law exists as an imperfect system

So, I am not your lawyer and this is not legal advice but... a bit of practical legal perspective on intellectual property cases in the US:

Once the bare minimum threshold for an IP case has been satisfied to avoid being immediately thrown out, it’s usually not even worth discussing the merits of the case until you’ve

Thanks. It’s good to know thyself. I did at an early age.

You’re still wrong. Games are not like food court samples. We’ve known since the late 90's and reconfirmed via studies in 2013, 2016, and 2020 that bite size samples (demos) appear in most cases to *hurt* your sales figures by as much as 50%. We aren’t doing it because anything about regulations or lack thereof impact

Reallly? Because Healthcare advocates have already pointed out that the amendment protecting healthcare was left intentionally vague, seems to only cover emergencies with day to day and long-term care left out and mental health and juvenile health explicitly disbarred from the protection.

Totally, totally... also, this you guys?

So, if we go by the Gun Violence Archive, their definition of a mass shooting is:

He’s a really nice guy who worked really hard on it while streaming his work on twitch and it shows how committed he was to bringing it out.

And that’s why it’s going to be a component of the case: To figure out where the assumption ends and the reality begins. Regardless, this eliminates any idea that Amber Heard wasn’t involved with the article.

As it appears to be presented, the issue is that there’s now a clear testimony that Amber Heard collaborated with them on the statement, going so far as to make suggestions like including her restraining order (which her lawyer apparently nixed), and appears to have in effect hired them to produce it to her benefit.

So even if we follow your argument without assuming you are too much of a bad faith actor to actually address its flaws, you then seem to believe that any content which has a sexual component in a mixed audience platform is an attempt to sexualize to children? Because I gotta say, I thought we stopped believing that

And possibly as a result of the Scarlet Witch’s shenanigans in WandaVision, as there are some allusions there as well. And Shang-Chi’s surprising reveal that there are already some weakened multiversal barriers which may also be breaking down. Basically, this phase has strongly hinted that a bunch of factors have

The actual reason given by Miyazaki is that in his opinion, it would split the userbase’s experience.

[citation needed]

1) A blaccent can be thought of as something between an accent and a dialectical pidgin between African American Vernacular English and Standard Edited American English.