No you don’t. If Your point and shoot has mechanical zoom even better. It is interesting they you are interested in photography enough to want to do the challenge yet you don’t want to spring for a dslr. I hope that by doing this challenge you find the inspiration to want to stretch you capability with a dslr. …

I’m confused. Because he hasn’t experienced institutional racism, he should be treated poorly due to his race?

In the same interview, he points out WikiLeaks has publish eight hundred thousand documents about Russia. You didn’t actually read it, did you?

Wow, what convenient excuses.

So where does that leave you?

Assange has been interviewed by plenty of people for plenty of different outlets over the years. He’s been interviewed by other such right wing rags as Rolling Stone and Der Spiegel and NPR and Time and PBS and The fucking Colbert Report. He was interviewed by la Repubblica like two weeks ago! The fuck is wrong with…

Hmm. I’m starting to think you don’t have any evidence to support your position!

The cognitive dissonance of you complaining about the existence of WikiLeaks and complaining about the elimination of ethics oversight in government sure is something to witness.

Replying to yourself instead of to me and completely ignoring the substance of the argument. Fucking Democrats, man. No self-reflection whatsoever.

Have you not seen the numerous repudiations of that Guardian non-article from the person who actually conducted that interview with him? Literally everything you’re describing is made up. Even the Guardian itself issued a half-assed retraction directly related to the part you’re quoting. Did you scroll all the way to…

Now, he says Russia doesn’t need a leaks site because “[i]n Russia, there are many vibrant publications, online blogs, and Kremlin critics[.]” 🤔🤔🤔

Just because other things are fake news, like how 50% of Clinton voters baselessly believe Russia actually manipulated the counting of votes in the election, doesn’t mean everything is fake news. If you can present any evidence anything WikiLeaks has ever published is “fake”, I’ll eat my hat.

It seems like everyone is reversing course on Wikileaks, Assange, Snowden, and Manning now. The right is beginning to embrace them, and liberals are turning their backs. It just goes to show that most people aren’t operating from any sort of stable principles. They’re only interested in the momentary political value…

The left still loves him because he and his organization do good work, like exposing Republican and Democrat shitheads for the shitheads that they are.

It judges your dryer and suggests you not use hot and also thinks that bitch, Susan, should just mind her dicking beeswax about you and Stan.

You can respect the office of the Presidency as a citizen and decline to perform at the same time. It’s not like they’re being requested to work on the second Manhattan project, or something else that impacts the fate of the country.

“There’s a microphone that listens to the sound of your hair as you brush to detect correct or incorrect patterns in your technique.”

Regardless of your political leanings, I think you should respect the Office of the Presidency. It’s an honor to perform at the inauguration and does not imply an endorsement of the specific President.

What a shock, a liberal can’t accept the opinions of others.