Is there any explanation she could give you that you could find satisfying? Probably not.

Yeah, she probably did. Having celebrities campaign for her (twice!) was one of the dumbest moves of her campaign.

Worked since she was 18? LOL. Name one damn thing the Children’s Defense Fund actually accomplished for people.

They let you have internet while you’re held Trump’s internment camp? Wow, what luxury!

This isn’t just about leadership. This is showing us who she really is, and in turn why people don’t like her. Her down time is her chance to prove to people what she’s really about.

The guy does not look 90, not by a long shot. If he’s younger than that, and he’s been doing it for 60 years, it means that he started his announcer job being younger than 30.

Riight. I’m sure Github and Lifehacker really want you to buy tractors. It’s part of their fiendish and nefarious plan. It’s not to tell you about the largest platform for programmers to collaborate and a requirement in practically every programming job, it’s to sell you an effing tractor that they sneakily don’t even…

Nobody gives a shit about your anger. Your anger is duly noted and forgotten about when somebody else’s anger draws more attention.

I never said her job was policy. Being in communications and PR, which what her job is, as you pointed out, means lying for a living. So her lying in her book and plagirizing is the very thing that makes her qualified for the job.

Exactly. So what better qualifications could she have than being a liar and a plagiarist. That’s the job description of a plagiatrist.

No, they have not. Crowdstrike is the only firm mentioned, and they were paid by the DNC.

I doubt that. When I said dirt, I literally mean dirt. Allergies in Amish communities is practically nonexistent because they play in the dirt and their parents don’t buy antibacterial wipes or any other modern cleaning products. My money is on your house being far cleaner than theirs.

Oh, it’s wrong to talk about huge economic decisions in 140 characters? Why? You’re quite happily assuming that everyone who disagrees with you is a conservative white man with no female friends and an idiot to boot.

Anecdotal reports from store owners calling up reporters don’t mean anything.

Hillary was able to raise $1.5 billion for her campaign, and spent most of it. If Medicaid cust affect Planned Parenthood’s ability to stay open, then maybe they should hire her as a fundraiser.

People losing their shit in their internet comments is not evidence of influence. Despite all the verbal hissy fits, people are still going to work, paying their bills and raising their children in the same ways they were before the election.

What evidence is there that he’s influencing people to actually change their behavior?

Boeing’s one day loss was literally more than made up the next day. Their stock price is literally the highest it’s ever been. Trump trashing them has been nothing but a boon to them, like with Vanity Fair, NYT, and every other company he’s trashed.

You think that people making $7.25 an hour, if they work full time, can afford any new car and the associated expenses? Do you not understand how math works when you’re earning $1100 a month, or are you one of those math phobic Jezebel idiots?

No, they should ignore his pronouncements because he’s not President AND because his “pronoucement” has no bearing on the reality of the office. You think the President can levy import taxes by executive order? Learn some civics, man.