That is just wrong. The only way you could think peterson wants to keep traditional hierarchies and keep women in their place is if you haven’t actually listen to what he had to say from his own mouth, and instead just read and listen to the propaganda against him. He believes that hierarchies are a fundimental aspect…

Can you give me a link then, discussing the voter suppression in Wisconsin?

Only when I call them a fucking moron for disagreeing on any given topic, sure.

Sorry man, If my choice is between a reality TV star and the mother from Manchurian Candidate, then it’s pretty hard to vote.

Are you serious? because I’m asking for evidence of wrong doing, I must be a deplorable fox news watcher? I don’t watch cable news. It’s a shit show circle jerk. I only listen to NPR, and so far I have hear little about it, or just accusations without evidence. and I am obviously ignorant about the subject, which is…

I wasnt being dismissive, I am genuinely curious. Do you have any evidence of this? those are pretty heavy claims. what is a voter roll perge? What type of ID, was required, a specific voting one, or could a state or driver’s license suffice? if it was the former, did literally everyone who voted have to get one? You…

There’s only two things I can think of that Trump did that I liked, though one of those I’m sure he had little involvement in. The first is get rid of the hypocrytical plastic water bottle ban in national parks, and the second is screw a pornstar. though he technically paid for that, so it doesnt count.

the same could be said about hammer and cycle waving antifa Hillary supporters, could you not, and as ironic and contradictory as that sounds?

I didnt vote for that idiot. Hell, I didnt vote at all. The American presidential elections are akin to religious indoctrinations, complete with matching colors, paraphanilia, croud fawning chanting, and axiom spouting psuedo-religious figure heads.

Im sorry? are you referring to something I said specifically? As far as I’m aware, I haven’t actually insulted anybody the way others have hurled them at me. 

I understand where your coming and I agree on a personal level, but there is a difference between forcing others to use it compared to asking others, is there not?

I’m curious, how exactly did the GOP suppress minority votes? By requiring Identification?

I know what sophistry means, and even the definition you gave is apt in discribing your current discourse. What are you doing, if not using your wit to cleverly dislodge my argument by attacking the peripherals, instead of the argument itself. And you can play the semantics game all you want, but a there is little…

Couldn’t you technically say that about every president then? or only the conservative ones?

You know most of his actual work in the field of psychology has very little, if nothing to do with Jung, right? I’m sure your interpretation of Jung is far superior to his, so how bout informing me what he gets wrong?

where? let’s get em!

I see that you are. I’ll just assume you you don’t actually have an argument, for you have made that eminently clear.

your sophistry is disappointing. I’m curious, why won’t you actually try refuting my argument? I’m sure your fully capable. Is what you are doing really that much more enjoyable?

Ignoring my grammar, what have I said that was stupid, and why? Im sure you enjoy what you are doing very much, but an actual discussion would be more satisfying. You willing to try, or are you fine with you childish “everything you say is stupid” approach?

You can normally tell when somebody doesnt have an argument, they do everything but refute your own. I’ll assume you cant actually disagree with me so your only hope is to discredit me with ad hominems. I’d actually like a real debate, but you seem either unwilling or incapable. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt…