*Lance.

To be fair to you, "You don't want to hear this one artist, so you must not want to hear anything" is only slightly less terrible attempted logic than "hoping someone wins/losses a court case = You hope they get raped".

If only there were some way of Googling this.

She hath indeed played a stupid game, and hath now winneth a stupid prize.

That's okay.

No. Never.

You can barely make a good game out of that.

Why are you bringing up Ted Bundy when we're talking about John Wayne Gacy?

It is literally a defence of the KKK.

How many African orphanages can be funded by what he must pay in insurance?

Fucking sell out motherfuckas.

I am indeed upset that you've been reduced to Trump-style declarations that your opponent is guilty of actions and behaviors that anyone can see are actually your actions and behaviors, but that's not important right now.

Apparently you both do, since "The part where that's what Kesha is suing over?" is both a) Factually incorrect, and b) Not an answer to the question I asked - which was for the record: If I say I am in favour of whatever outcome in a court case stops x from doing y, in what sense did I actually mean I approve of z…

Selected quotes from yourself:

"someone has already been raped you asshole."

You haven't answered the question: I am referring to this court case. Explain which of the two possible judgments that can be ruled will result in someone being raped.

Like I said: Whatever prevents Kesha is best, whether that end comprises her tongue being pulled out or his hands cut off…

What part of this potential court judgement involves someone being raped?

Can about two million Californians really be referred to as "a Russian stooge"?

Look, whatever prevents Kesha from making music I might accidentally be in a position to hear, I'm okay with.