Why would someone post every detail of their life on social media? That’s...well, that’s modern youth, I guess. Obsessed with having every aspect of their lives validated by anonymous strangers.
Why would someone post every detail of their life on social media? That’s...well, that’s modern youth, I guess. Obsessed with having every aspect of their lives validated by anonymous strangers.
Texas reply: “The only way this could have been prevented is if the woman and baby had their own guns as well.”
Cruelty to animals (or humans) doesn’t cross the line. Neither does rape, murder, incest, bribery, solicitation of prostitution, corruption of any kind, pathological lying, being plain stupid or criminally insane, being a Russian patsy, etc etc..
Because he knows that the “good people of Pennsylvania” will vote him in if he promises to hurt the people they hate.
Jesus, Snide! I am impressed. Do you play music really loud too when you’re cleaning? I have seen several friends that go into a whirlwind type of meditative state.
They remember, they’re just lying. Don’t know enough about Kavanaugh but, we all know that if Trump is talking he’s lying. We also know enough about Walker to know that he’ll lie as easily as the Orange man. They’re fucking lying, period.
Yes. But to be fair, I think they are starting to get divorced more often and may have a few more windows of single-hood. (My data is compiled from occasionally reading about Bristol Palin against my will.)
Conservative are a backwards bunch in that they want YOU to be perfect but you’re not supposed to be offended by their flaws.
Hoo boy. Now you’ve got me thinking about the would-be Georgian politicians who apparently weren’t as electable as Herschel Walker. God help us.
When there are little to no substantive consequences for men’s bad behavior, why should they remember it at all? Where’s the incentive for them to care? History has shown us that human decency and empathy aren't enough of justification not to do hurt another person.
“What I’m about to say is by no means a contradiction or a compromise of a principle.”
Dude hasn’t lived in GA for 40 years and didn’t even graduate; lies upon lies upon lies.
This is best take I’ve seen before, and yeah, it’s grim. Whenever my jerk Hillary-hating co-workers used to ask me why I voted Democrat, I would tell them I’d rather fail trying to do the right thing. It’s still true. But it’s cold as hell out here, particularly when, as you say, the other party never gets penalized…
They will never have to decide this. You forgot option C: I like winning at all costs and don’t actually care about being a hypocrite. It’s a wonderful umbrella that covers both A and B.
They are so confident at winning that they don’t even have to hide their true feelings. Abortion is murder, but murder is justified if you can take back political power to lower taxes for billionaires.
I’ll go darker even. I don’t think it shows that they don’t belive abortion is murder, I think it shows that they don’t think that murder is wrong, as long as it is commited by someone on their ‘team’
They’ll rationalize it in their minds by saying that the “skank” (to quote Loesch) forced him to do it, and she’s the one who actually murdered the child.
Their problem is with the person getting the abortion. He only paid for it, which is good for the economy or something? So he’s a job creator I guess