I say this because I've already driven the Ferrari approximately 4,500 miles in the six months I've now owned it, and I haven't had a single problem. That may not seem like much driving, but it's an enormous total for a Ferrari. Most Ferrari owners drive approximately 11 miles per year, and those 11 miles are the sum…

Nice, but did they really have to name it the "Sesevenen"?

It's fundamentally an economic problem. Tuning works by

Or have a LaFerrari and 918 do burnouts in the Ford parking lot during a Friends and Family Day—-on the 4th of July.

After watching the whole review, though, you might wonder if it was Walter Röhrl more responsible for the final result than the cars themselves.

That's really a whole full post, and I want to focus on one smaller thing here. In the usual story of the Beetle, Ferdinand Porsche is the brains behind it, and made a number of prototypes that evolved into the Beetle. One of those was made for the Zündapp motorcycle company.

... because Shkoda is actually the correct pronunciation. People who say "Skoda" also say "Porsh".

The first one where he bounced looked like wind shear. That at least would explain the sudden loss of lift.

Regardless of whether it's bad or good, the recent Skoda models are not old tech but generally within a year or two of the Audi/VW versions.

Whatever you do, don't google "Tub Girl"

How is this about you?

The problem now with the A8's turn signals is that they aren't big enough when the sequence first starts off. Berlitz says the sequential design better tells drivers which direction the driver is indicating to turn than one bigger, flashing light.

I agree. Unique, useful layout. A shame it was so ugly.

Explain the 1999 Fiat Multipla, then

I tend to think of the acceleration score as a subjective score, too. Else, we could just use a table.

One of the contributing factors to Opel's problems is that while they are actually one of GM's major engineering centers but are not adequately compensated for it. Their engineering is used across the entire GM, but Opel itself can only make money with it in Europe.

So what you're saying is that battery swapping essentially is the breakthrough technology we are waiting for, and it's a more realistic than magical new battery technology.

As soon as battery technology ceases to confer a competitive advantage, standardization will happen to some extent for cost reasons alone. As you say, there are a number of benefits to standardization.

I agree on the need to standardize for battery swapping to be viable. However, I feel that standardization is unrealistic:

I applaud this on two counts: