While I agree with you, it's still kind of hilarious to be referring to a $100,000 vehicle as "democratization".
While I agree with you, it's still kind of hilarious to be referring to a $100,000 vehicle as "democratization".
The truck I have now (that I bought 12 years ago as a one-owner vehicle) still had the previous owners home address in the navigation “home” section...thought about parking there April 1 and leaving it outside with a big note that says “YOU CAN’T GET RID OF MEEEE!”
The fucking thumbnails. I don’t even get past those, so I don’t watch majority of the videos. I don’t know what happened in the past 5-6 years, but the thumbnails have gotten out of hand. Every single one of them has a stupid click bait title and an idiotic, punchable face. And not a single of these videos actually…
I’m curious about that too. That pic makes no sense to me.
In reviews, when they call every car good, or report on something really stupid like touch screen climate controls, say they’re mildly annoying and quickly move on, not realizing that anyone that buys said car will be stuck with its inconveniences and bad design for years on end, every single day. Car reviewers need…
I didn’t watch the video, but based on the picture he could have simply parked nose in and been a helluva lot closer to the charger.
This for me too. The close up stupid shocked, devastated, or smug happy face. I know it’s testing that’s driven this but I hate it. I also can’t stand when they are manipulated in a way so it looks like they are standing in a pit next to the car as the taillights are at their eyelevel.
Basically the type of thumbnails they’ve all been using for several years now. It looks obnoxious and desperate. If I see “CHEAPEST” yet again in your stupid thumbnail, I’m not clicking on your video, even if there’s a chance there’s actually decent content behind it. And I blame Jalopnik alumni Tavarish for being a…
Hey, that’s no reason to park on the wrong place!
Most of the replacement parts can be gotten from a 720 so while still very expensive, they’re able to find through 3rd parties. I think they mentioned that a new tub from McLaren is over $200k.
I don’t understand why the majority of consumers still think always-on connectivity is a great feature to have in cars. I won’t buy a new vehicle unless I’ve already figured out how to physically disable that connection the day I buy it. I have a cyber-security background, and I know most, if not all, manufacturers do…
yeah, it’s a one-of-one exactly like the other 500 Sennas
Well, it’s not full, but what makes you think there are ZERO spare parts for a production car? Sure, limited production, but this is a production car. There was tooling built to produce 500 of these, and it’s not like that tooling was immediately destroyed when #500 rolled out of the shop.
He’s free money regardless. Any time he puts in a claim, just go to his youtube page for all the proof you need to deny paying out
“Bent frame”. Serious question- does that car even have a frame? I thought all McLaren were a carbon fiber monocoque. That metal subframe broadly just bolts on and is replaceable.
I’m no car-ologist but those don’t look like slicks to me. And I get the feeling they didn’t swap the wheels when they dragged it to the wreck lot.
Yea, I don’t think ‘slick tires’ is what caused that. In fact, quite the opposite.
Somewhere, Eddie Griffin is laughing his ass off..
“Slick tires”? The fronts look like PS4S to me.
Slick tires? Sure looks like its on PS4s