adacci
austin.dacci
adacci

Eh, depends how you measure "intelligence" in terms which is the smarter choice. Yes. Intel will get the the best top end performance. However, the majority of computer users don't have any tasks that would fully utilize that processing power. AMD offers the best performance / dollar ratio hands down. If your goal is

Uhh, I have used Windows and Mac both and never had problems with malware. MSE is probably the best anti malware tool out there and its free. Mac has its problems too, not just as many cases because the sample size is significantly smaller than Windows.

+1

Congress should take this to heart. They can actually work in a bipartisan manner, instead of stonewalling ideas and wasting time

+1

I have read that Straight Talk advertise Unlimited everything, but if yo use over 100mb a day of data they will terminate your service (after 3 warnings). Is this true?

A laptop can do much more than an RT tablet, but the $800 model will be spot on with most laptops. The only thing where a laptop would potentially have it beat is gaming performance, and I don't think too many people are going to want to game (high end gaming ) on a tablet.

Now playing

This illustrates my argument a little better. A super hyped device that people are excited about just because they are told to be. Call me a cognitive dissonant fool if you want, but you may also want to look in the mirror.

I have never argued that people didn't enjoy their Apple Products. Only that the publicity of their products is sensationalized. You are taking this way too personal, and projecting yourself as kind of an arrogant prick with your condescending tone.

Apple equals hits because of their past. At one point in time, their products were in a league of their own in terms of design, performance, and even value (if you take into account the longevity of older macs and compatibility with their software). The original iPhone "was" very innovative. It was a game changer. It

No. What I am experiencing is looking at things in an objective sense. I said nothing negative toward Apple. Nor, did I imply that media outlets were receiving compensation from the company. My point is that the Media knows that Apple = Hits aka Viewers. They are a lightning rod. What the media does to capitalize on

Spiderman was being held captive by the villainous Sony!...and who gives a shit about the F4?

That part is just common sense...it was a stupid name. I think what he is getting at, (and its not just Gizmodo), is that Apple get so much media hype for releasing a product with features that have actually existed for a while now, and preaching like said features are a product of "Apple Innovation".

This really isn't "new" news. We have known that nutrient content is not significantly different. It is more of what you DONT get when you eat organic foods that provide the health benefits. It is also much better for the environment. One thing also to consider is phytochemical content of fruits and vegetables

I have seen this done before in the past, but it required an Intel Processor. Anyone tried this with an AMD machine?

You wouldn't necessarily look that fat. It would just make it appear as if you were 5-7# heavier which could mean the difference of 2 points higher on a BMI scale.

I guess you wouldn't have to...but I wouldn't want 25 foot cord from my remote (keyboard) going all the way to my wall mounted HDTV.

People would then ask the aliens: "What Diety made you?"

Ever heard of bone density scans? Mineral composition and bone density can have a significant affect on ones weight.

This would be a pretty awesome way to make a HTPC. You would obviously have to have a NAS, and a dual band router...also a wireless HDMI adapter. You would have a full keyboard remote for it.