All art IS NOT activism (and shouldn’t be, but that’s another matter). Think of your OWN definitions of art and activism (whatever they may be) and you’ll see that’s clearly not the case.

Ok so this is obviously trolling right ?

This HAS to be a joke right ?

“I think she’s one of the more talented artists to come out of America in decades.”

What you’re saying is very stupid.

What you’re saying here is very stupid.

It makes sense that Sulkowicz considers themselves greater than any one person.

Of course she does.

She owes you, her fans, and the public at large absolutely nothing, just like you owe her nothing.

“I never thought the leopards would eat MY face,” sobs woman who taught at St. Leopard the Face-Eater Parochial School.

Actually, no. Despite the “feud,” it would have been more of a glaring “zit” had she, a co-star of Ms. Catrall for many years, to have said nothing at all. That would have come across—at least to public gossip mongers—as being insensitive and a “well, she (Kim) hates me (Sarah) so too fucking bad about the loss of her…

No it was not. The original intent was always stated as being to “ensure [they] sell *high quality* merchandise and stand by it with *satisfaction* guarantee.”

I wish sterilization didn’t have the bad rap it did, because *having children should not be the norm.* We have too many kids in the world, and most people are not going to be amazing parents. We should pour the resources we have into fewer kids with higher quality childhoods. “It takes a village” and all that.

Were it that easy and uncomplicated. Your comments reflect that you truly don’t understand how the business side of the industry works. A producing credit is way more common than you think, the people that have power to go along with those credits are a smaller number. Executive titles mean as much as the organization…

Gasp! sweeping generalizations about a broad group and diverse group of people? Are you sure your not a not one of these racist and sexist Greek people?

...and frankly if I read this, I’d make damned sure you weren’t in any position to make hiring positions. If you are, you shouldn’t be.

Pinkified girl toys “in the last decade”?

You are all being purposefully obtuse. If we eliminating nuance while discussing a broad range of behavior is unrealistic and not productive. If we treat every individual instance of misconduct as though it’s the worst possible, thus making people who are not totally irredeemable sociopaths into completely ostracized…

There shouldn’t be a difference? I’m sorry, that is fucking stupid. Stripping all nuance from the conversation is not productive. Turning a range of behavior into a black and white conversation isn’t realistic. I don’t understand why, in so many contexts, we liberals care about details and nuance, we understand that…

I get the point you’re trying to make here, and I appreciate it. Yes, it is bad for men to rape, and it’s also bad (but not as bad) for them to sometimes deliberately ignore cues when they are inconvenient. But unfortunately, just about every straight man has probably done some of these bad things, so cutting them out…