Well, you could try not assuming negative things about people.

"Don't act like you were doing anything but insulting me."

You consider it not being "classy" to show consideration toward the mental concerns someone else might have? There are plenty of people online with various mental concerns which might cause them to misinterpret something in the immediate without a specific framework - and they deserve to share their opinions in a…

Thank God!

It is 100% fine to reference or make allusions toward the first film or previous film or "original iteration" or similar. It is not reasonable to make it the entire point of the review of a differing subject.

Well, what you took from this view seems to be due to your own assumptions/assertions/interpretations/etc. So while you feel you had the perception of the quality of this film conveyed to you in this review, what I saw was a reviewer - while making clear statements of distaste regarding this film - continually…

*tries to figure out what's wrong with thinking some characters should be weak and others shouldn't*

It's Dutch. No further explanation necessary.

That's not what I'm putting forward ("Sin City: A Dame To Kill for exists in a bookless, televisionless, playless and movieless - aside from itself - vacuum!"). What I'm putting forward is that, when conveying a sense of it to what is relatively "the public at large," one has a responsibility to those people to put…

What are you even talking about? I have no clue what the quality of this individual film is. That doesn't make having the review for this film basically be about another film somehow reasonable.

You're overgeneralizing what I put forward. It's a reviewer's job, in the case of film reviewers, to convey some sense of the quality of film one is going to see. That is their "responsibility" to the public. The random, opinionated assertions of high school students do not relate to that as they have no…

By…watching it as its own film and, if anything, making sparing note of the original for contextual reference for the readers? I mean - if I'm going to go see this movie, I'm going to go see this movie. Not the last movie or this movie as seen through the prism of the last movie. Sure, I might try comparing it…

But that he could tackle these subjects with no irony is fairly ironic. Thus, making it all ironic. Thus, canceling out the irony. Thus…uh…

This review - like so many others of this film - can be summed up thusly.

So not me then? Got it.

I think I'm looking hard.

Who cleans their anus? Honestly.

"…will seek out only the best and cutest kittens…"

But you say doppelgangers of their "first love" - but isn't that what these are? As, compared to the latter loves (the doppelgangers who are actually other people), these are first.

…Until later today when another celebrity does it.