acarney
acarney
acarney

No, I mean now that I've seen it every time I think of ghostbusters I think of how horrible this was and how my excitement for more is crushed and stomped on.

I saw it Saturday night. I would have been fine with the all women cast if they had written better characters for them. it was played hard as a comedy with what felt like a joke quota for each scene. The originals didn't feel like that. They were fun and kinda fun, but it felt like the movie was taking its self

Don't condone a damn thing he did... BUT it totally should have been done toward the corporate Sony account since they ruined my wonderful childhood memories with how horrible this movie was >.<

I will agree that the baked in stuff is HORRIBLE. That said, maybe pickup an AppleTV (or other device, but I can speak to those) and give it a shot. It's one button click into Netflix and then picking the Netflix menu selection you want (search, recently watched, etc).

Horrible horrible horrible ass movie. If they recast it all and treat it as a serious movie that just happens to have funny and charismatic actors/actresses in it, then I’m all for more ghostbusters! The originals didn’t grind the story to a halt to squeeze in as many jokes as possible. It played more on lore and

So are you saying in the video above where we see the car avoid the truck that it was more dangerous then just human? Because it looks like the car moved out of the way, not the human...

So wait a second... If I can find a 2009 Jetta with ~95,000 miles on it and back calculate to roughly 85,000 miles or so the adjustment is $0. Then if I look up the buy-back price for Pacific Northwest it shows ~$12,700 buy back price (or like $4500 repair compensation). So if the price of the car was $10k, could I

That's one that needed to be higher speed. It was cool, but not as impressive as if it would have been twice as fast or something.

So all those “Lamborghini” rally racing was actually this thing skinned as a Lamborghini...

From my understanding reading comments from the Tesla blog and other industry people is that the glass now a days actually acts to strengthen the car structurally in a fairly cheap and easy way. (Think about it, EVERY car has a windshield). What Tesla has done is take that “proven” simple technology of a big

Also when working a coffee cafe gig I was told the fridge/freezer was a horrible idea. They said that the low humidity and dry air would actually dry the beans out faster, possible building off other comments of pulling the oils to the surface of the beans. MAYBE completely sealed air tight bags would be ok, but

I suspect this is for extreme cases, the person that’s so heavy doing much physical activity is either painful, or extremely difficult, but at the same time isn’t able to be supervised 24/7 on what they’re eating. People that have reached that level need a big mental change in their eating habits. That isn’t going to

I don’t see anything wrong with Tesla’s reply, especially since it turned out they weren’t in the wrong, or at least FAR from recall level and out of warranty period. I suspect the verbiage on their agreement is more to keep it from being used in court AGAINST Tesla. They’re erring on the side of maybe something odd

Has to be a large enough pickup that you can shoehorn the boxster into the bed of it, then make sure you start the engine of the boxster and let it run while you’re driving around... Otherwise you’re honestly only ever running on six cylinders... Which lets face it, could be the likely outcome of the V12s Doug

MatPat explains the math behind his calculations or cites sources when talking about how to tell if someone is lying or how to optimize dating techniques etc. He’s missed the mark plenty of times, but has always shown you HOW he did and that gets you thinking that there is more to everything then just the surface that

Hey now, Alaska may not be as hip as Virgin, but they've got awesome on time performance and a great mileage program! (Though it sounds like they'll keep the mileage programs separate for awhile anyway...)

Honestly that’s what I always think too. It just never seems to work out right when factoring in checking into hotels and maybe a rental car if needed. Always seems to maximize time if I depart somewhere like 4-6pm & arrive late at night and hit the ground running early the next morning. Maybe their west coast service

The handful of times I've checked JetBlue they've always been a horrible red eye flight (when looking at long haul transcontinental service and late night, 10pm + departure for midrange service 1000 +/- 200mi.) I know airlines bid and pay for gates and schedules... I don't mind the idea of a 6 hour red eye, but in the

They already did, or have plans too, it's going to be indoors :)

“Developers developers develope...” Oh wait...