I sadly have to agree with ya on the ship looking like utter crap, despite immediately recognizing it as Ralph McQuarrie’s rejected Enterprise design for ‘Phase 2'/’TMP’.

I suppose its a nice idea that they used that concept art for the design of the ship but goddamn if it isn’t ugly as sin.

Oh, pull out a history book give it a glance

Well, The Doctor could be a female AND ginger.

Yeah, don’t engage. Basically every Doctor Who is an excuse for his Moffat bashing, and he puts a lot of time and effort into it.

The show is fine. It makes a lot of money. The biggest threat to Who is the same it has always been, the general apathy of the government towards BBC funding. The show has totally been going…

I won’t argue that the show has had declined in quality some over the last few years (please, please let Clara just be gone for good), but don’t you think it’s a bit histrionic to declare that Moffat is “trying to make the franchise crash and burn around him.?”

I’d love to see 11 again in a future multi-Doctor episode. As for this though? No.

This one was never the Enterprise to me. It was a bloated, unbalanced mishmash. The ripped off the saucer from the 1701 refit and made the rest out of hot rod parts and too many flashing lights. All it’s done for three movies is get it’s butt kicked. Good riddance.

One can be emotionally and intellectually mature without being a boring old fart that only does boring old fart things in their spare time.

Great idea. Now get off my Lawn!

Time: “How does the Heisenberg compensator work?”

Damn rights! lol.

“No privacy” can be kind of a big deal for political dissidents, people whose private inclinations are harmless to society but likely to cause ostracization, people who are attempting to keep abusers and stalkers out of their lives, and so on. Depending on how literally it’s interpreted, it’s also going to represent a…

This is one of most unintentionally hilarious pieces of PR I’ve every seen:

Making the antagonists frontier isolationists also makes them foils of the Federation’s ideals in sort of a fresh way, and all the best Star Trek antagonists are foils or dark mirrors of the Federation

Does Paramount know they have a bomb on their hands? I love Star Trek. I really liked the 2009 film. I hated Into Darkness. A week or so before this opens and I still have no idea what it’s about , other than the fact Idris Elba plays a complex bad guy who so far seems exactly like the bad guy in every other sci-fi…

The best Star Trek villain is clearly the whale probe, because it’s so chill that it just wants to hang out with whales and its master to plan is to scream, “Hey! HEY!” so loud at the Earth it makes our oceans evaporate.

Whale probe needs to learn boundaries.

Soran, Shinzon, Chan, Krug, The Borg Queen, and Khan all pretty much fit into the “sinister and cranky villain who hates everything Kirk and pals stand for” category, don’t they?

The creators seem to regard the source material in more esteem than Abrams did. Justin Lin is a capable filmmaker in his own right, if not really the style I’d choose for Star Trek (granted my preferred Star Trek is slow and talky).

Making the antagonists frontier isolationists also makes them foils of the Federation’s…

On the bright side, he has a Minbari War Cruiser for a head.