I think there are a number of ways they could take the Brent setup that would make sense to me...

I think it’s also interesting that you can’t really call what Jason did murder...he knows Derek will reboot so he isn’t removing him from their mutual plane of existence...let alone permanently or irrevocably...

you seem like an overly kind person - it’s quite clear they’re not ok...or even interested in being ok...

it’s weak trolling but it’s entertainingly circular...

my guess is at least one former member of the alleged administration lost their post for pretty much exactly that...whether physically, verbally or metaphorically I couldn't say...

I don’t know about a nifty chant but the clean up server has finally made sense for me of where the hell he thought he was going with the whole “acid-washed” email thing...

I get that it can be confusing...& contractions of little are arguably not the easiest...do you go lil’ for the lack of ‘e’ at the end or li’l for the missing ‘tt’...

last time I looked there was a separate drop down menu in the browser on my phone that had options like “open new tab” & “find in page” that had a “request desktop site” checkbox but I guess it depends on the browser...?

not sure about a cheat sheet but as far as I can make out step #1 is “don’t be on a phone”...after that the drop-down options toggle from a link on the top right corner of the comment you’re typing...in theory you could tick the “request desktop version” box & reload the page even on a phone but it’s a pain to get…

“I’m not acting as a lawyer...the president just finds it convenient to refer to me that way because if he doesn’t then he tends to call me his consigliere...which, I dunno, is like a bad thing apparently...fuggedaboutit..."

always room for a Princess Bride reference...

“semantically reframe” is a nice touch...I’m still fond of misconstrue, myself...but it doesn’t get the recognition you’d think it would in an age when folks are so apt to do it...in some cases deliberately...& here & there quite possibly criminally...

[apologies for the wall of text...it’s a bit of a tangent, to put it charitably...but I’m inclined to stand by it, I think...]

I’m genuinely begining to wonder if he hasn’t been thinking “total extortion” all this time & just saying “total exoneration” because the two represent the same thing to him...namely doing whatever the hell most recently occurred to him ought to be his unquestioned privilege...like total war but for wannabe-mobster…

well, I guess they believe in themselves...

based on their implied belief they’re contributing to the conversation I’d say whatever the answer is it won’t be worth the time it would take to listen to, much less type up or read...

would that be that farm upstate where you tell kids their ex-pet moved to...?

I wouldn’t dispute your assessment, as far as it goes...

I don’t know...I must not have been paying attention...