Any reason they didn't show that on an actual iPad?

@Aashish Bhagyanagar: Agreed, and I'm English. They need to buck up.

@alienshards: Or because there has been a new iPhone every year since 2007...

@twothefutureandbeyond: Agreed... how about wireless syncing and how about being able to use multiple computers with one device without it having a shit fit.

@Bryan Porter: How's Zune doing?

@telepheedian: Good point actually... even though I wasn't thinking about me.

@ddjeffries: See my reply to gizgizgiz.

@gizgizgiz: The comment in the article was supposed to demean the "3%" speeed increase Vs the current fastest browser.

"it's a whole 3 percent faster than Chrome"

Holy shit Herrman...

@gebinsk: Without all those gullible folks buying gen 1, gen 2 would never happen.

The point about 3G is half fair... sure it should have been possible on 3G, but at the same time, WiFi is almost always faster and you'd want to show off your new tech on the fastest platform.

Can't they finish Front Row? Or maybe just FTFF!

@Ozzie's Secret Code Name: MisterWho: Interesting way of looking at it - it was a fairly significant jump from iPhone 1.0 and even 2.0

@Techno-Atom: That's good to know - the GMA950 does far better in Windows than OS X (I am not dual booting anymore, as my HDD ran out of space). I play DA on my self-built desktop anyway.

@The5thElephant: True anough and it does look amazing at even modest settings. The only frame rate that matters though, is the minimum, because quite honestly if it drops to 15fps or 12 fps it becomes unplayable. Crysis is a beast!

@Pressure: You mean the GF104 naming and GF100 specs? You read the same thing I did then - well you could be right, but either way if Apple follows its previous model for releases, this year will be a minor upgrade, next year will be a major (i.e. chip set) upgrade - I don't think they'd encourage huge hardware…