Exactly. Depp was notoriously a trash fire of a human well before that ridiculous trial, and he got creamed in the UK proceedings.

She didn’t ‘lose’ and he didn’t ‘win’. He settled for $1 mil instead of the $10 mil he tried for initially. And it’s funny you mention people hating to work with her, because everything I’ve ever heard from *before* this absolute circus of a trial went down is that she was lovely to be with on set (and in general). I…

to each their own.

There are four pedro pascal entries? Rigged. Also, no Tobias Menzies? Irrelevant to me.

Thank you. This was bugging me all the way through the article, and ended up being the only part I cared about in the end.

Tabi is short for Jika-Tabi the Japanese word for this type of shoe, and it was invented in Japan . Margiela did not invent this type of footwear. geez.

I’m not too sure about that. Through the lenses of the women (Peggy, Joan, Betty, and even Sally), Mad Men was just as much about what women had to suffer as it was about how badly men behaved.

I can’t answer your question about non-actors, but I will say that I’m pretty sure if she didn’t have Depp at the end of her name, she would be modeling at best. She’s not Colin Hanks.

The labor organizers will call out the behavior because they want/need the attention, and there’s really only one tone/vibe with which can approach the story (i.e., outrage, scorn, pearl clutching, etc.) Frankly, they need all the help they can get, and can’t afford to be picky about their opportunities to get press.

The comment wasn’t made in an acontextual vacuum apropos of nothing—as written, it raises the inference that this behavior evidences that Klum is anorexic. That is the purpose of the comment, to very strongly imply she’s anorexic without coming out and saying so explicitly. And when you determine that another person…

I don’t think that’s among the criteria used to diagnose anorexia in the DSM-V.

wut

Bwahahahah. I am glad I didn’t drink the Kool-Aid, because I can still listen to her songs now. Life has fewer disappointments and rug pulls if you expect all creatives and celebrities to be d-bags from the get-go.

We’re looking up to the wrong people.

For those of us who take child abuse seriously rather than as a sensational news item, “grooming” is a means to an end. What’s being reported here is admittedly cringey behavior that did not, reportedly, lead to the actualized or attempted sexual abuse or predation of a minor.

What an insane take. So how much, in your expert opinion, would be a reasonable amount of restitution? And why would a lower number be any less subject to, as you say, disappearing into “government coffers”?

peta is a terrible organization that turns off most people to the idea of animal rights and shouldn’t be calling out individuals just buying a pet. bother farming  corporations and big box pet stores that still sell animals.

It’s entrepreneurship, actually. Comparing thrifting to colonialism is fucking outrageous, and actively offensive to people actually suffering under colonialism. 

This article is one of the worst try-hard examples of attempting to create some sort of controversy out of absolutely nothing.

You do realize Emily was only kidding in her dry British sarcastic jest right? Her husband didn’t actually say that. Did you even watch the segment? Comments likening Krasinski to Kanye. Really?