I had not realized that "bang for the buck" also included the "boner hardness" element. If it were like that then any nut who likes a shit car can claim it's the best bang for the buck because it makes him feel good. You just don't get it.

Purity is a part of sports car performance, it's just not a part of "bang for your buck". Bang for the buck is about tangible numbers, not emotion. A good example of this is the Mustang vs. M3, in which the Mustang is said to be better bang for the buck, but the M3 obviously feels better.

I completely agree.

"Bang for your buck" doesn't equate to driving purity. "Bang for the buck" directly relates performance to price.

The GT-R, ZR-1, Mustang, and so on have been labeled "best bang for your buck", I have yet to see anyone (journalists) say this about the FRS. The attraction to the car is more about the potential of the platform rather than it's immediate abilities. What "tuner" leaves a car stock?

One difference I can think of is that the RX8 was supposed to have 250 hp, Mazda was insistent

"The mark of a good rider is the number of years he's been on the road"

Because Biturbo V8.

If they have access to new Honda Accords then they have access to V8 RWD cars.

The GT3 R Hydrid is certainly not donkey balls.

I see. I've never even been in a Fiero.

The u-turn pissed so many people off? Ha, you must've never driven in NY.

Question: What if you didn't like the Fiero, would you still find it comfortable?

Figure out their achieved MPG, you'll be less impressed.

While this feat seems comparable to water torture, it probably wasn't. The main reason that driving slowly is a PITA is because of goals. Your goal is to get somewhere and it will take forever at "x" speed. However, when the goal is fuel economy and you don't really have to be anywhere it could actually be, dare I…

I also find that part of it strange. CYA I guess. It's also strange that they elude to having insufficient information regarding the fire, yet they know about fireworks, electrical panels, etc. Who the hell would want to own one of these, especially from a company that'll throw you under the bus in a heartbeat.

They didn't build custom Jukes from the ground up because they wanted to retain as much of the Juke as possible. The idea was to swap the drivetrain and suspension, and add the necessary supporting mods (cage, etc). That's why there are no power adders on it. Maybe it was done as an example of what the Juke would…

Swastika? Eh, I'm opposed to it.

The Juke-R has 485 hp using an older motor (2010?).

"You need someway to tell the bottom of the wheel from the top when you are hooning."