Oh it's far from a non-issue. I assure you.
Whokebe
Whokebe
You don't love men. I guarantee it.
Maybe if you stepped outside the fucking echo chamber you'd find that things weren't as bad as you've convinced yourself.
Oh no.
No, and it's funny: they didn't have such a class at my law school either.
I see this conversation has gone over your tiny little head. I'm sure the next poster you treat to you half-thought-out harpy outrage will be as grateful as I was for your cogent insight.
That's correct, but it's a faulty analogy that assumes a conclusion. Let that marinate for a while and try again later.
If you had more than a room temperature IQ, you would have noticed that I drew a clear distinction between the legal concept and the underlying principle. But you don't, so you didn't.
So this is how fantastically misinformed posts riddled with faulty logic are rewarded on this site? I see. lol.
LOL. I can see you're not exactly gifted when it comes to making substantive replies.
Please point out where I wrote something misogynistic. tyia. It's very telling indeed that once your argument was plainly lost, you resorted to name calling and straw man attacks.
See, that's just it. We don't actually know that he "violate(d) another student," because a) there was scant evidence, and b) he was "tried" in a kangaroo court. But we've gotten to the point where men can suffer severe consequences for sexual misconduct based on the word alone of a female. That's wrong, and if you…
Rule 1: Women are never at fault in any matter sexual. Rule 2: Women never, ever, ever lie about rape. Rule 3: If you disagree with either of the above rules, you are a misogynist working in furtherance of rape culture.
You're a little mixed up there, friend. But good effort.
Nice strawman, and ironic conclusion.
Well, maybe...just maybe...it had something to do with him not being a rapist.
I'm offended when people's lives are ruined by genuine kangaroo courts that operate under no obligation to ensure due process. That's my answer. If you can't handle it or wrap your head around it, feel free to get back to whatever bitter little enterprise keeps you coming back to this site.
Well hello there Crystal Mangum II. Did you manage to ruin any more lives?
Note that there is a difference between the Constitutional right to due process, and the underlying principle. It's like you have no idea that one could be at issue and not the other.