WestwoodDenizen
WestwoodDenizen
WestwoodDenizen

Uh, at that point wouldn't it make more sense to just not have them in front of the camera at all?

I like how the giant wheels and the pole running down the middle of the open side make the lower shelf all but inaccessible.

Now now, let's all wait until her PED test comes back...

I like the fact that this can be used in portrait mode, too, but in landscape mode, it's just a really elegant, clean-up version of the existing docks for some Samsung phones.

You're comparing homosexuality to pedophilia? As if the two are equally tolerable and respectable lifestyles? And you don't think that's homophobic?

The difference here is that a repo man gets his compensation back when he takes the Ferrari, but a web designer is still out many unpaid hours when he takes down the website. Plus spray painting someone's house isn't easily undone upon payment.

Paid*

She wasn't in Garden State. Perhaps you're thinking of Natalie Portman?

One should direct all complaints to the author of the comic...

Bring on baby condoms.

Man, you guys are abusing Vimeo videos lately for articles. Lucky for you, they're generally awesome videos.

You guys are plundering Vimeo with pretty obvious regularity these days. It's like a classier YouTube.

When roughly 99.9999999% of the women on the planet AREN'T as closely related to me as my second cousin, why would I bother attempting to reproduce with one of the handful of women who garners a higher chance of birth defects and death, even if it is minute? Especially when there's already a societal stigma against it?

I understand that's the actual underlying sentiment. I was more commenting on the phrasing used in this article, which kind of avoids that proper explanation. I guess it's kind of a Rorschach test for someone being a PC d-bag that I failed, but at least I'm sane enough to know that my knee-jerk reaction was unfounded.

Clearly not the only one, since there is a response that confirms my interpretation, but thanks for playing. I don't think anyone involved is actually sexist, just commenting on the phrasing.

Seems to me that they need to consider a boys' field hockey team, at least perhaps a club team. Issues of gender and sports are always going to be muddied by cries of an unfair genetic advantage.

It was more your odd syntax and word choice that threw me. What do you mean by "a pinnacle of God and love"?

I think a few of you are taking my original post far too seriously. I don't actually think the guy who did this (or the author of this article) are at all sexist. I just thought the wording in the article seemed that way. Relax.