There’s also this which is already in the rule book:

Bullshit. He makes a clear attempt to simulate a fair catch. It’s plain as day and I guarantee it was intentional.  

Really? Because the clear attempt to simulate a fair catch stuck out like a sore thumb the very first time I saw the play.  

Even ignoring all the safety angles and fact the play leverages the increasing,y strict rules against defenders the play should have been disallowed or blown dead because of the clear attempt to simulate a fair catch. I still don’t know how the officials allowed that.

Oh, FFS. Are you really that stupid or just think everyone else is stupid enough to buy that load of bullshit?

“Probably” being the key word there. Because it depends on just how addicted your SO got.  

Nearly every kid around.  What world do you live on?

Unless you think they are going to fairly ordinary your comment is kind of contradictory.  If it’s a joke schedule they should roll.  

Ehh? What are you going on about? At no point does the author claim that group isn’t interested in Yellowstone, but rather that the show is targeted at more than that group.  How is this not obvious?

Maybe you guys should just quit expecting sports entities to act as a legal system.  They’re not.

My friends and I learned the levels so well we would strafe around staring at the walls the whole time thus making it harder for anyone else to figure out your location.

Nah, fuck that nonsense. Their cover is great and you have shit taste if you think otherwise. Sorry, but it’s true.

LOL... first if you think it makes sense simply because it exists then you are quite naive. Second, your very first sentence in defense of these payoffs is utterly laughable. They need to be attracted to the position even if they are incompetent? AYSM? If they are incompetent why the hell would you want them?

This sort of shit has been happening forever. The so-called “Golden parachutes” so many executives get after they drive a company into the ground. The literally fail at their job and are handed huge payouts on their way out the door while numerous employees below them get pink slips, pay cuts, retirements ruined,…

Isn’t this just the state of things in general now? It’s not just gamergate or even one side or the other. The internet rage machine is constantly picking over social media, random quotes, secret tapes, background audio, etc... and creating bandwagons against one person or another. No one waits for explanations,…

Exactly. At a walk up counter there should be no expectation of a tip anyway. So Why should there be a problem if someone leaves spare change in a tip jar on the counter?

Agreed.  One big change that’s kind of on there (but not really) is the ability to parkour down.  It’s the same button as crouch, but is a completely different function.  I actually find it hard to go back and play games that don’t have that ability after playing the newer games that do.

I really don’t understand their interpretation of the rules. To me “continuing” to hit a moving ball implies giving it a bump in the direction it’s already headed. Anything else should fall under the stopped or deflected rule. Of course, I also don’t understand why those are two different rules.

The internet mobs need no proof these days.

That’s not entirely accurate. GTAV had a new trailer debut at E3 and platform owners like Sony had presentations about the game. With RDR2 coming out later this year it’s not surprising some people are wondering why the game is totally absent.