Verrryinteresting
Verrryinteresting
Verrryinteresting

NC should be interesting. The demographics are changing, but Trump will bring out more racists and blue collar voters than Romney, McCain or Bush ever could. (That’s my concern about CA too, along with growing libertarian influences in the Silicon Valley/Bay areas). Ditto AZ, which I could easily see going blue if the

“Lamaze is a feminazi scheme to pussify men - who should be working when their wives give birth - into being a part of the only activity that God saw fit for women to do. And why is Obama hanging out around a Lamaze class in the first place? Is it because he wants to be a pregnant woman? IS he a pregnant woman?! Maybe

The FOX News comments section's consensus will be: “Tudor style. British. European. UN-AMERICAN! And probably gay."

Ugh. Even Arkansas? Where’s your homestate loyalty, Arkansas? Anyway, I’ll trust your superior knowledge about the south. (I’m up in New England if you didn’t hate me already). I was sort of hoping that Bible Belt Republicans would look at Trump, see a big blob of sinfulness and stay home, whereas Obama and the DNC’s

She and Clint Eastwood should hang out.

My sister was allergic to dairy and lots of other food until she became pregnant with her first child, and then all her allergies just went away on their own. So stories like Kevin Hart's *can* be real, but I don't know whether they need to be precipitated by a hormonal change or some other major change. She also had

Darth Cheeto might be the best Trump name I’ve heard so far, and I’m on Jez daily! Thanks for the detailed and polite reply. I know the Citizens United film was about Clinton, but she and the Democrats (especially the ones running for Congressional seats) need a clearly defined strategy for getting it overturned;

...A rightfully nervous person who’s probably depressed and has been conditioned to turn his/her anger inwards?

I don’t know who flagged you but it wasn’t me. Anyway, the candidates differ in some key areas where Clinton is anathema to independents. I know they can read her platform; the problem is they won’t like it unless it becomes clearer and tougher in those areas. And since the convention also determines the party’s

Yeah, it’s unfortunate that we can’t simply criticize public policy and the makers thereof without making all these qualifications. But when it comes to analyzing Hillary Clinton under such a sweeping headline as Brooks,’ you need to separate well-placed criticism from unjustifiable/batshit fucking crazy criticism due

I made another post like this earlier, but the Democrats need to get real and adopt a general election platform that will appeal to Independents. It would be a travesty if Trump won a single state this year. Independents like Bernie and they like Trump more than Clinton, and it’ll take much more than an endorsement

Me upon seeing Lindy West in the byline:

No, it won’t. This election is a dumpster fire of outrageous personalities and egos right now, but at some point it’s going to come down to policy. Trump has no policy to speak of. His biggest talking points are campaign finance and trade, but his only campaign finance reform solution is “Vote for me because I’m rich”

More to the point, has he ever seen a Trump rally? I saw one on youtube; it wasn't exactly a fashion show after party at Taylor Swift's.

Sensibility, critical thinking, willingness to speak up for basic decency, intelligence and ideas + Woman = Ugly to a lot of men like this guy.

These are Hillary supporters, though. Take it from a Bernie Bro: sometimes a candidate is better off without some of the supporters. #GetTheFuckAwayFromHer.

What if this is Blake's way of telling us that she is Becky...WITH THE GOOD HAIR?!?! Don't even try sleeping tonight.

“Mom, I met an amazing woman. She’s smart. She’s kind. She isn’t Hitler. Whenever we're together I feel like I'm home and I never want to be anywhere else..."

I for one would like Queen Victoria to weigh in on this.