Twil
Twil
Twil

Not only do they cover (most of) the cleavage, but they also take some of the girls’ breasts away. Alice goes from a C or D to an A, another only loses one cup while the lolis are left confused as to whether to envy the boob girls for having had a chest, or be relieved they weren’t body altered.

I guess we’re officially done with clever names for third (or additional) entries.

Well there’s me...but then I don’t plan on getting a Switch so it’s kind of obvious why!

Am I the only one who isn’t disappointed by this announcement because I didn’t fall for the hype for Pokemon Stars or a main Pokemon game for the Switch? Just me?

I have a feeling Yoko Taro probably isn’t thrilled with this change. That’s where this kind of thing gets frustrating; things being changed from their own creator’s vision.

And that bit of skin on the arm. TOO SUGGESTIVE.

Lolicons smell.

You’re reading me wrong. People having opinions is completely normal, but using them as weapons is wrong. Like I said, people moan either way we have it with censorship vs sexualised content. My point here wasn’t people having the ability to moan, but people acting upon it. It’s a detriment to everything.

Honestly, they look younger after their tits have been removed. Before they looked 18-20, now they’re looking like 12-14. So if those stores were into loli pedophile stuff... they succeeded.

It’s pretty damn pathetic Western society can’t see a pair of breasts without immediately sexualizing them, just like nudity.

I don’t think the OP meant people can’t have opinions, just that the vitriolic way we tend to express them is hardly proportional to the issues we bemoan

They didn’t just cover them up, they cut them off as well o_o

They’re drawn as 20 year olds, but typically are labeled as 14-16. When localized, that label usually gets changed to 17-19.

I’m not going to cry censorship or anything, but this seems a tad excessive. It’s just cleavage on characters that don’t look prepubescent (to me at least), or am I missing something here?

It’s rare that an artist will alter a finished product to cover up the body “because they wanted to.” It’s because someone told him to.

While I don’t really object to people having or showing cleavage, since it’s something most people either have and/or appreciate, My beef here is that the new image looks very muddy indeed. That could just be down to your sources Mr Ashcraft, but the original looks much crisper by comparison.

Now cover up those thighs as well, please.

Liberals are the new Inquisition. Welcome to the new world.

cry over scantily clad barely pubescent girls