Twil
Twil
Twil

Well, she lied about her kickstarter. Then you have her saying how objectification is bad... unless she is sending letters asking for donations, that end with a picture of her in a strapless dress, showing epic cleavage. She is a full-on hypocrite, confirmed fraud and a liar. I still consider her a smart person, but

She killed the conversation not the trolls, she locked anyone from being able to criticize her work. Work that doesn't stick to the facts as many other youtubers have clearly shown, she misrepresents a lot of stuff in order to support her arguments.
She's a liar and should not represent women unless you want men to

Harassment, the same as you call anything when someone harasses someone for anything. Doesn't need it's own special catagory.

I'm sorry you were ostracized, and I understand the feeling. i have been bigger the other kids my whole life. I inherited a mild case of my parents breathing problems so even when was young it made sports hard.

As a chubby person, the title of fat shaming offends me more then someone calling me fat...

It's not really exclusive to the internet, I'm a pretty big guy. Though I've lost a lot, I stopped taking the bus to work because people were fat shaming me. Not sure people understand how difficult it is to lose weight for some people, that added with depression and being shunned by others is a pretty horrid

I don't hate her, I just don't appreciate her opinions, value her comments or like her very much. She's a sad product of what happens when you give everyone in the developed world a camera and the ability to broadcast themselves.

Jim Sterling is a good start in terms of talking about women's issues in games and caring about both women's issues and games, and he's just lovely.

Of course. This again speaks to her intelligence. She is not stupid. Her disabling comments and ratings enables people to actually respond to her. Because they have to do it in videos, and some ridicule her, some refute her points, some agree with her, but the emotional responses and rape threats are extinguished.

Some aren't justified, but I would say a majority are, but in all seriousness, she should be someone that the world should ignore, people like her are the ones that cause problems, not fix them, and it's painfully obvious, not to mention she is a lying 'B', that makes up shit all the time.

To be fair, her army of zealots kills any possible conversation. If you disagree with anything she says, you're a woman-hating Men's Rights Activist. I do want better representations of women, and I want someone to talk about it. I just want that person to be funny, charismatic, and oh yeah, actually give half a shit

Not really. That entire fiasco was total bollocks. Some of the best games of the last generation included female protagonists and several of those were released last year. Personally, I completely disagreed with the PR witch hunt that Ubisoft and others faced last week. Like her videos, it seemed to be nothing more

But she is a dishonest person who even disables comments in her absurd videos.

so... he can't be fat and happy? He has to change to fit your liking? I see.... mmmm... no one needs that kind of abuse...

in this case, as in most cases, it was over exaggerated. You can see in the foto that the guys is not taking up all that much space compared to the two people right next to him.

Kotaku's own pet troll strikes again.

I think I would find Conan's video game coverage more charming if I actually felt like he sincerely enjoyed video gaming. Even on his clueless gamer segments, it always seems like he is just in it as a source of cheap jokes that rely heavily on negative stereotypes about gamers.

GODDAMMIT, GO AWAY FINAL FANTASY 13, NOONE LIKES YOU.

But then you are just arguing for the artful representation of the sexualization of underage kids. Do you really want someone to decide what is or isn't allowed based on whether the act is depicted in what would be determined to be "culturally relavent" or "legitimately artful" works? How would you define that? Since

I think the most commonly cited reason is still the best one. However disturbing, drawings are not real. Banning fiction for age would also necessitate the ban of other works like Romeo and Juliet and Lolita, both classic works of fiction that involved underage female leads in erotic situations.