So he is not saying and not marketing this. And it results in you posting this story to IO9, which is full of the sort of folks who might see this movie. Driving up the hype and interest.

OK, so there are two of us!

I'd settle for their mobile iOS app being able to sort "Most Recent" correctly. I have a most recent comment from mid November, followed by a few more out of order, then some actual most recent ones way down on the news feed.

For what it is worth I must be the only person on the planet who watched and really enjoyed Kevin Costner's The Postman. I thought it was a really well made movie that had some really good performances. Go figure.

Christopher Walken would much rather have a tail than wings.

I am not saying computation can invent thrust out of mid-air. What I am saying is that; given thrust, something that will not move as desired through the air can be made to do so more via computer control. E.g. Fly by wire systems, helicopters and even rockets. And I do think that there is some intrinsic value of…

Yeah, the F-117 example was just an off-the-cuff example of the first thing that came to mind to try and show the point. As you say, a helicopter would have been a better example. But it was the first thing that popped in; mostly because an article I read that said the thing could not fly without computer…

Didn't want to ruin the fun; just was trying to say that you were so obsessed with a minor point that you missed (or didn't care to discuss) what I was really trying to say. I think we were trying to have two different discussions.

This is more living space, and is nicer, than my dorm room which I lived in for five years.

Well, you have put WAY more thought into nitpicking my argument than really paying attention to the real point; which was that technology allows things that can't normally fly to fly. So replace my example with "helicopter" and go with the spirit of my argument instead of fussing over the specifics of my…

I am not at all claiming that the Enterprise has the areodynamics to fly. But I am suggesting that technology allows things that are not normally areodynamic to fly. Extrapolate from that.

Zack Snyder, if anything, is a master of beautiful imagery. So the movie will be pretty (and so worth the price). The question is whether or not they will build a decent story out of it.

I think it is because it is hard to believe that there is really a choice. I don't choose who I am attracted to. Even as a straight guy I either AM attracted or I am not attracted to a women. I have zero control over what women I find attractive; it just IS.

I'm a fan of Yahoo Mail. Never saw any reason to switch.

#1 is a must have. Making the keyboard cover and "option" is really just a way of trying to hide a higher price. Make it cheaper or throw in that cover at your base price. Either that or sit back and watch if flop as people buy iPad's and Galaxy tablets instead.

You go on record saying you don't need a case because even with a strong case you can still break your screen. That is irresponsible advice. While it is still possible to break the screen it is LESS LIKELY to happen. Which is a perfect reason for buying a case.

I'm sure my kid knows there is no Santa Claus. But we're in a deadlock on this. I refuse to admit it. He refuses to admit he knows better. I think he might suspect he won't get presents or something if he says otherwise —so he looks me right in the eye and talks about Santa. And be both know the other knows the…

You can't string three words together without Harlan Ellison coming out of the woodwork and claiming he invented the whole thing.

I meant the F-117 and I was reading (cannot cite the article, sorry) that the plane would not be able to fly at all were it not for computer controlled microadjustments as it flew because stealth was a greater imperative than areodynamics. That sounded to me like more than just fly by wire. Just my take.

I can handle a slight onion taste in my food and it enhances but if it is the predominate taste something in my brain cries ick.