ThrowsLikeAGirl
ThrowsLikeAGirl
ThrowsLikeAGirl

A thousand times yes! I'm astonished the number of people that still think that. Scalia even makes a vague suggestion that if you read the 2nd and thought it out, you could make the argument that *only* guns with a valid military purpose would be covered. But that's not either here nor there.

I know there's a lot of people calling for this guys head on a pike, but think about it... wouldn't you rather have him continue to serve proudly with his dignity intact? He's a Purple Heart recipient, which means he's probably been in combat and seen some crazy shit... maybe buried a few of his buddies or had to

I'm sure John will wind up embroiled in a scandal over this yet somehow. "See, I needed to test a new engine configuration, so I borrowed your engine for the test. same with the hood ... and tires. By the way, I need $80k more to finish this."

It's easier to take out of storage...

To me, this is a Cyclone. Specifically, a Lincoln-Mercury Montego Cyclone Spoiler.

Buick Grand National.

Syclone... SY-clone.... not Cyclone.

I don't have the sticker on mine... we're limited to 500lbs I think. LOL!

Check out SyTy.net Always a few prime examples for sale.

Yep... SyTy's love their jackstands. They'll chew through rebuilt transmissions faster than a fat kid eating candy, and if you don't pay attention to your fueling, you'll make a window in a piston pretty fast.

I think the people doubting how GM could make such a shit car, or wondering why a "dumb Monte Carlo" is so expensive, I think you're missing the point. This car is like Prometheus giving mankind fire. Buick did something unheard of at the time, putting an entire industry on it's ear by using a Grandma-ready grocery