ThndrMge
ThndrMge
ThndrMge

Yes, because asking "is there a way to filter articles? Patricia's work tends to be generally unrelated to the news and information I'm looking for," is "feeling threatened by someone promoting an experience outside my own." Or, like I said, ya know... I just have no interest in that sort of article because I come

Yes, because, I, who sat around playing Pokemon and Final Fantasy throughout middle and high school, who still enjoys playing games such as Persona, Monster Hunter and Disgaea, am obviously "a jock who mocked videogames." What the hell are you even talking about? I asked if there is a way to filter the content on

Or, ya know, the readers looking for actual video game related discussion and not a feminist movement article wearing a video game costume. I can understand and do not deny females have it harder in life sometimes, but I come to Kotaku looking for videogame related discussion or news (good example: the recently posted

Hmm, is there a way to display author in the sidebar for the articles? I really want to stop clicking on Patricia's articles, because it seems like almost every single one of them I've read is basically a feminist-heavy "moral sob story" with a generic title that could mean anything. Like this one for example, "It's

I heard there's this thing called the "Television" it's going to put movie theaters right out of business! YOU CAN WATCH THOSE AAA MOVIES AT HOME NOW, UNBELIEVABLE!

I don't recall ever saying the technical aspects of this video were poor. The video is a great quality and well edited, and that has nothing to do with the content of it. The fact you find the idea of a prank gank unfunny just suggests to me that you have zero tolerance for open world PVP in online gaming for whatever

Isn't that what I just said? I have to repeat myself quite a lot here it seems... None of what this guy does is funny, he has a few good points, in a very general sense, like I said before "don't feed AWS" and mocking the "stereotype of the Grrrrrrrrlgamer" (girls that game just for the attention and not for the

What are you even talking about? I just said that this video takes a good funny idea for a joke (ganking an attention whore) way to far (excessively mocking and berating women gamers in general.)

Fundamentally, I agree. The girls who play these games, yet hide the game in the bottom corner of the screen (only 25% of the actual screen) yet advertise themselves as "A gamer that plays X" when you can barely even see "X"... I just thing it's ridiculous. However, while trolling is funny and all occasionally,

You ever stop to think that maybe the team of editors at Kotaku just really love Far Cry 3? I'm sure there's a game you've talking your friend's ears off about whenever the subject of games comes up. Be realistic, sometimes a game is just that damn good that it deserves the attention it gets. Far Cry 3 seems to be one

Well put Tony Danza!

"First of all, now that you're back: get over yourself." Stopped reading there. Joking or not, I do not condone articles berating my opinion (the end part was a little sketchy too, but you are indeed entitled to your own opinion of those games as well). You said this game is a bit like an Angry Birds clone. Angry

Does anyone else find it interesting that he's so opinionated and informed for being a "Former" Senior Manager in Foster City? It just seems unusual to me that a former employee in the "SCEA" division of a company that is mainly rooted in Japan would know so much. I mean he probably knows quite a bit, sure, but he's

Ya, it's funny, cause Squall is in no way emo, he's just opinionated, and much like most people in real life, doesn't often share his opinions.

No, I very much grasp the concept of business and company management, while I may not have any personal experience with the matter, I very much realize that money is pretty much everything to a business/company/etc. However, to claim that any factor except sales figures do not have an impact or influence on the

Personifying companies will never stop. Those individuals at the company that are of "differing opinions" honestly, and very sadly, do not matter. Why? Because they are not in charge, the ENTIRE team working on Mega Man Legends 3 could have loved and cherished the series and even that specific game so much, and

I'd rather turn on an audiobook or watch a movie while mindlessly grinding than have to do the same thing for several extra padded hours just because the combat system is "more complex so you have to pay attention/feel engaged" just for the sake of being "more complex so you have to pay attention/feel engaged." I

To be fair; SnS and Lance are also amazing weapons for multiplayer, especially with friends who play to the strength of you being able to "tank" a mob for them. I had several friends who weren't "pro" at the game, who just wanted to play with weapons they enjoyed like Heavy Bowguns and Great Swords, so I did my best

I very much agree, MML (much like your GoldenEye example) did not age well, BUT that is not to say that they couldn't tweak the games and make them fun again, I think MML3 was Capcom's opportunity to show their stuff, "Look, we made Street Fighter 4, a widely acclaimed fighting game, and we can make Mega Man Legends

See, this is a post/comment I can get behind. While I do not agree with or support the Wii U myself, I am not OPPOSED to sharing one of my all time favorite series of games with other gamers. I just simply do not like the way that people gripe and whine. "We feel left out, can't we get some lovin' too?" Humble and to