No - That case can not be made. Plus, since he's a professional athlete, they won't attempt to make much of a case at all.

To be fair - There was also a time when the native advertising that Deadspin utilizes would be seen as wholly unbecoming as well.

I'm not sure which point you're making. The right one is that he's probably going to wind up being one of the bargains on a big contract.

It sounds like your post is more like further proof that fans inside of Miami have ZERO knowledge about baseball..

Drew would like to remind you that Deadspin, TheMMQB, Grantland, BleacherReport, ESPN, etc.. is completely allowed to prostitute his sexuality to earn money... but Sam? Sam is not allowed to, or he less of a human being.

Don't try to act all contrarian to the popular view point, when you can be proved factually wrong. It was the Clippers' ball, and they missed the call. That's not really being debated.

He is a possible first round talent, because it gets a headline. He's not that particularly good at baseball, at all. Prior to his breaking out in Football, he was a non-prospect. Nothing's changed, except he's famous now.

I understand jokes, the fact that you've went 4 rounds on trying to make your joke was why it wasn't funny.

My problem is that you think your standards for acting should dictate whether not a very successful actor should be allowed to attend a show that is wholly about fame and not talent. Also - What do you consider both of his better movies? There's a strong chance that's your problem.

Calling one of the bigger movie stars in the world a terrible actor that can't be bothered to attempt an accent, is an odd stance to take. Not to mention, it just means you haven't seen some of his better movies. Also - I'm not sure acting talent, whether he had or not, is a prerequisite for a mega star to attend the…

You couldn't figure out why a legitimate movie star, might be at the Oscars? That's an odd problem to have.

Easily the best comment thus far, today.

The amount that Drew Magary thinks he is different from other writers is adorable.

Yeah - You could. I get the sense you disagree with my point, but by posting something that is factual and proves my point, doesn't really seem to achieve your desired effect..

You're missing my point. Until this article was being investigated, the authorities didn't have the right to know a crime was committed. She didn't report it, and she had a right to privacy from the medical officials that she did tell.

Wrong - If the victim does not want her rape investigated, they have no authority to do so.

The victim has to be the one to report the rape, many victims don't have a desire to report it. Until they report it, there's nothing to act on.

Just so we're clear - That "appropriate form" is kind of a big effing deal. It's called HIPAA. It's to protect the rights and privacy of a patient. It works both ways. There is no obligation for someone to report a rape, for someone. They need to do so. I'm guessing she did, and that's where the problem comes from.

You won't be allowed to attend the summit though, because it was also If you build it, THEY will come as well.

It was not at the time. Using wikipedia is cheating, at the time of the offense. That's why your analogy was bad. Not sure why the original guy didn't spell it out more clearly, to save you the time.