I don’t think criticizing likely candidates in 2018 and supporting them in the 2020 primary are mutually exclusive. I, personally, would like to be able to be very on board with Kamala Harris. But her history as a prosecutor concerns me, and comments like the ones above only concern me further.

I’m not sure how the progressive platform could be dragged further right than conceding ICE is necessary despite only existing for 15 years.

The defense of her being distant and uninvolved is, “actually she’s been to the office a whole two times in the last four to five months.” Amazing.

That’s interesting, I tried to leave and Pascal said something that I took to be the game letting me know I couldn’t leave. Do you just have to keep trying?

Spicycriminal already addressed the dead-ender thing, but as someone who didn’t initially think “Bernie would have won” was obviously true... once all the numbers came in it was pretty clearly true.

So, first of all, thank you all for all the work you do. I mean that sincerely.

I think there’s a pretty big leap from “black women preferred Hillary” to “black women wouldn’t support Bernie.” (Or however you’d prefer to characterize the opinions espoused here.)

The big problem with I Am Setsuna was that it was entirely unambitious. It unfortunately seems like the same might be true of this game.

I would much rather have Colin Kaepernick backing up Marcus Mariota than Matt Cassel.

I’ll agree with Breer’s premise that QBs don’t automatically get a job by being in the top 64 or 96 of their position, but Kaepernick is fairly obviously a top 32 player at the position. Wonder why Breer doesn’t see that! Hard to say.

Re: Dr. Poison, I thought the point was Diana spared her because she realized that even the people perpetuating the war were victims of the war themselves, and thus deserved some mercy.

Personally, I would change the headline/writeup to reflect the fact that he almost certainly did not tweet this personally.

Right, but it doesn’t even seem like he’s the favorite to start at this point and they know Siemian isn’t a longterm solution.

It also bears mentioning that the Broncos, who reportedly came at least kind of close to trading for him last offseason, haven’t approached him despite not really being set at QB and otherwise being a very competitive team.

In fairness, that’s a fairly accurate description of the actual events.

I’m fine with Fallon being apolitical, but it is literally impossible to do an apolitical interview or segment with a presidential candidate.  

Except Scalia, who compared Planned Parenthood v. Casey to Dred Scott, was actually a terrible human being.

What norms and principles did you think I meant? Because those were the ones I meant and you said they were bad.

You’re misunderstanding me if you think that is your point.

A citation is needed for a question?