Not saying anything pro gamergate, just repeating all the gamergate talking points every chance you get. Keep trying, you might convince somebody that it's really about "ethics and fair treatment."

You are the perfect example of gamergate. You argue on the side of gamergate then claim to not be a part of it.

There have been plenty of fair articles all over the Internet on many sites this week. And they all show gamergate for the hateful group it is. Sorry if that is news to you. But you're a member of a movement that, when women are threatened harassed and fleeing their homes, you see it happening and then yell "What…

I'm really curious to see if gamergate says anything about this game. One of their main complaints is that gamers are made out to be angry, violent people. And this game, coming out now of all times, really really paints gamers that way (fairly or not).

Because gamer gate is a movement based on hate. Started by a bitter ex hoping to ruin somebody's life. It's not legitimate and it never will be. No matter how many times you guys spam the comment sections of websites you claim to hate, yet still follow closely so you can always comment.

Haha keep saying that. Maybe people will start believing you.

Gamergate has had fair articles. It's just that when you look at it fairly, they still come out looking like awful people.

Apparently it is kind of a guy thing. I'm a guy, and I stand to wipe, but not if I'm in a public stall. The risk of seeing/being seen through the crack (hehe) is too great. I just don't like the idea of my hand getting anywhere near the lid/bowl. Also sometimes the goods can swing and touch the side.

Little known fact, Tony La Russa cannot be photographed. He has to be digitally added in after the fact.

But gamer gate is the trap arty movement for nerds.

Yup. The scary part is some of them are really good at hiding the crazy. But they all eventually let it slip out, just gotta give em time.

Vaginas, DUH!!

No it started with a very vocal minority of disturbed individuals who have then attempted to spin it into a legit movement. Because they can cause more harm when some people think their harassment has a point than if everyone knows they are doing it because they hate women who dare to disagree with them.

Yup he is, DON'T YOU SEE THE TRUTH NOW!!!!!!!!!!! DON'T YOU SEE HOW ALL THIS IS JUSTIFIED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hahaha if that is your smoking gun you have problems. And you guys say Anita Sarkeesian cherry picks and reaches in her arguments.

Same reason people need to know Anita Sarkeesian is a feminist.

It's not, "ethics in journalism" is their code word for "articles about diversity." What they really want is a gaming press that never talks about sexism, racism, or anything else other than praise for how awesome "gamers" are.

Man I must have missed the article where kotaku said gamers were fascist pigs. I must have read the actual articles, instead of the made up you did.

One sentence talking about 3 highlight games in an article about 50 new steam greenlight games. Man reach harder and you can get to the moon.

But Thompson wanted to restrict video games legally. She is just critiquing them for sexism, like thousands of people do for books and movies everyday. And I'm pretty sure Thompson didn't have a sustained campaign of harassment thrown at him, but then again the internet was younger then and gamers are more horrible…