And how easily do you think it is to rebuild a Judd GV4, an engine still in use these days in various motorsports, versus a defunct Formula One motor from a random F1 team without any support?

Actually being the GV4, this is a motor meant to run Le Mans, meaning it will easily cover 5000km.

Asian Le Mans Series

Eurasia and Algarve are not WEC teams, they only ran WEC races as invitational entries. And the MR Ferrari is out due to travel problems related to COVID.

Movies are movies. This is real life.

Not only is his shirt not interrupting the race nor changing the race, but it is not an inconvenience to the viewing public to have to see something.

I believe two of them are run in conjunction with another team, one of whom is Bryan Herta Autosport. However all the engineering comes from Andretti’s shop, so six cars isn’t underheard of.

I wonder what Chapman would think of Donkervoort. Do they still meet the ethos of simplify and add lightness?

Dallara were contracted out to build the tubs for Ferrari. No different than Dallara developing the Audi R8 chassis or the entire Chrysler LMP.  Is the Viper GTS-R a Reynard because they developed it?  Or is a Corvette C8.R a Pratt & Miller and not a Chevrolet?

Yes, as in farmed out.  Chevrolet don't build it.

And Callaway has a German racing arm, who build their race cars.

The Camaro is built by Reiter Engineering and the Corvette is built by Callaway.  Both are German-built machines.

There is no Chevrolet GT4 car. You are perhaps confused with the Cadillac in GT3, which was never actually offered for sale?

Except this race was specifically for real races.

A competition is a competition.  The medium used doesn't matter, if it was a competition amongst sportsman, it's not "just a game"

I believe the Abt in the team name is his father. And Audi has taken more control of the Formula E team over the years, Abt likely only brings the crew. Like Audi Sport Team Joest, Joest were the crew, while Audi was calling the shots.

Again, you are not grasping this. No one is talking about changing historical documents. They are talking about using the correct name in reference to those historical documents. We are viewing these records in the present, we should refer to them in context of the present. If someone wanted to be indepth enough to…

Referencing and changing results are two completely different things. Your attempt to insinuate that anyone is attempting to change history is completely failing to grasp the difference between reference and results.

You seem to be confused. No one is saying that we change items from the past, but that in the present we refer to things by their current state.

Reports and results and media and various other things in the past are almost certainly full of mistakes. Do you take those mistakes as facts or do you accept the current…

I believe the DTM Mustang was a private affair, or at the very least only supported by Ford of Germany, not by the overall company.

The Sierra didn’t exist in the United States. Further, IMSA rules leaned more toward tube-frame cars than to the homologated GT and touring cars of Europe.

That said, Ford did campaign the Merkur XR4Ti for a year, which was based on the Sierra, but it was a tube-frame car and was simply a rebodied tube frame of the…