Wait so the "evidence" he's a nazi is that he made the obviously sardonic "worse than Hitler" remark? By that logic Larry David (the Jewish comedian who often makes "worse than Hitler" remarks) is a full Colonel in the SS.
Go back to cowadoody, that's what the 14 year olds are actually playing, it is the children and the childish adults who refuse to play any Doom game because it's not got 3D graphics or about killing arabs like most COD games.
"The issue is that there's no real accountability and standards set for enthusiast press sites. And there needs to be."
Does this site have a policy on the relationship between advertising for things and coverage of the thing - or another thing who owns the same thing they want you to feature in banners.
Shots fired!
It's got a hard act to follow, and I'm not talking vanilla doom, I'm talking about the mod everyone says is so captures the Doom nature:
It would have to be a catastrophic failure if the recent reports are true of debris scattered over a large area. Catastrophic enough to rip open the fuselage and start separating the seats and internal components of the aircraft.
Because you could say "here have this money" but be thinking "I don't want him to take my money" then go to the police complaining of theft. But he was told you wanted him to have it.
"Consent is a thought, so if someone thinks they didn't consent, and that person is sane and not lying, then that person didn't consent... I can understand that you're frustrated, but consent will always depend on the "thoughts" of all parties involved."
Too close to my liking, and how can I be comfortable with the idea of she only THINKS she's been sexually assaulted. That's bad enough. Am I just supposed to be okay and be like the bad guy of Lethal Weapon 2 with Diplomatic Immunity Legal Technicality as the defence. That doesn't make it all right.
A judge will say "prove beyond all reasonable doubt" which generally means over 99% certain. Distinct from a civil case where it's simply "preponderance of evidence" which means just 50% certain overall.
No that still sounds scary, still a mistake away from "worst crime category ever" (sexual assault) especially as verbal expression of consent isn't true consent, they may feel through baseless fear they have no choice but to consent. I'm not even talking about legal basis I'm talking about how THEY may be genuinely…
"It doesn't matter that you were making out, that's sexual touching. You misread the mood? Or maybe your partner did? It is still by definition sexual assault."
This is obviously the "fetch my abstract cubist corgie" button.
As is always the case in war, technology proliferates. Any weapon of war you develop will only give you temporary advantage before it is used against you.
Especially as NK have been threatening they would like to and really could do that. Homefront is practically North Korean propaganda.