Talk about the cat out of the bag. That tweet from sanders just about confirms what I’ve always speculated: that “He” is the only one to bring about progessive policies and anyone who isn’t “Him” is a centrist. Fuck that line of thinking. Warren and sanders have a lot of overlapping policies and he should recognize…

That would mean he would have to admit a mistake and that’s just a non-starter for him.

It never ceases to amaze me when people who are wrong about something decide to get extremely pedantic in order to claim that they are actually right. Whether it be conservative politicians, religious figures, anti-vaxxers, or whatever, they always turn into walking dictionaries as if that is the slam dunk response to…

I mean... okay, Joe.

I’m from Philly and I can’t even come up with enough words to describe how dumb WIP and those dinguses that call in truly are in the grand scheme. This might be indicative of every major sports city with a radio sports crew though.

Well for her, sometimes you gotta write from personal experience... it would seem. 

I honestly saw the headline about a suspect from Lousiana that would burn black churches and a name came to mind... Caleb.

I’m willing to bet real money it drags it out to the end due to his ego. He’d rather be the progressive/left guy than help the progressive/left guy/gal punch through.

Exactly. That is why they keep screwing with voting rights there.

EDIT:

Back in 2015 or so, I thought Texas had the potential to be in play in the upcoming election and very much in play in 2020. Now, I’m not as convinced of this. However, this could change. It really depends on getting the very diverse electorate out in Texas and running a good candidate to spearhead House and Senate…

+1 sick reference bro

The Divison: peMdas

Take, for example, unpopular 2020 Democrat presidential candidate and staunch capitalism-defender John Hickenlooper,

I’m of the mind that Democratic voters - on the whole - are looking for something of a real shift and not the steady progression to the next step.

See my follow up comment on the weird coalition part. I was compartmentalizing the portion where the author mentioned “Catholics who vote for the Abortion Party” when he was removing guarantees from the ACA in order to not anger them. I should have been specific.

Apologize for saying “weird” coalition. That was a poor choice. 

I just recall his performance in 2008. Granted that was a time when two giants were running in the race alongside him (and Edwards), but he was rather stiff and only had the “Rudy Giuliani 9/11" line that was memorable. Plus there is the baggage from his previous run for president that I feel would bring him down.…

Or perhaps another secretary position. 

I have a feeling that the debates will weed out a lot of these candidates much sooner and soon enough for them to join any senate races. That’s my hope at least.