StillProbablyWrong
StillProbablyWrong
StillProbablyWrong

I’m disappointed you spent zero time on probably the largest concern, which is pay.

Some jobs may advertise it upfront, but if its a job you’re chasing after, with a title you want, but doesn’t explicitly state the pay, you’re in this grey zone of not wanting to appear solely focused, but also having bills to pay.

What does a new Vita, games and memory run? Last I checked it was coming in near that. Granted its $300 plus games, but with sony proprietary memory its still a close comparison.

This analysis misses the point of taxes entirely. I could live in a state with zero taxes, but I’d have no funding for schools, roads, infrastructure in general or anything else. I am not a corporation, subsiding on profits, I am a person, who needs societal benefits, like police, firemen, emergency services and

I mean its not like we have a statute of limitations on crimes or anything.

Let me quote you:
“In fact, if they really thought about it, had the reality of what they’ve become shown to them in all its nothingness, they’d be horrified by it. People have an alarming ability to ‘cope’ with abhorrent things when they have no choice in the matter. And they’ll willingly stay in that state until you

If only we could communicate with them to find out if they “have most likely suffered irreparable psychological damage as a result of their symptoms.” 

Man using impersonal technology to reach out to people he would otherwise never be able to communicate with due to external factors decries the use of technology to allow people to reach out to people they can otherwise never communicate with due to medical factors.

News at 11!

What about if you’re in a position that is relatively neutral (sure clients suck, but not terribly, and management has your back/ co-workers are cool), BUT there is limited growth opportunity and limited opportunity to develop new skillsets, AND BUT your compensation is above market rate and time off/vacation is

And you think this was all the ACA’s fault? Or are you just complaining about Capitalism within healthcare, and because you want to be hip and cool you’re complaining about the most recent effort to combat that? Because without the ACA, premiums would have risen even more than they did. And also a bunch of people

As a possessor and owner of exactly one (1) “child” I can concur, with this addendum:
“Should you want kids, think about whether you prefer to be the drunk at a party (1) or the one taking care of the drunk at a party (2). Person 1, don’t have kids. Person 2, you’re gonna be dealing with that drunk for 18 years,

*daughter

Oh really? That’s great! Can you move my job closer too? And offer essential services and amenities in the same proximity?

Its damn easy to just hand wave away the actual minutia of what goes into housing choices, and you offering nothing substantial other than empty criticism is the only dumb thing around here.

“I have no idea who “Mr. Curtain” or “Mr. Curtin” is btw.” <— So... you don’t know who I was debating when you inserted yourself into the conversation? Why are you even participating?

The fact that it took six days for you to work up this “rebuttal” is incredible. Your use of quotes and BOLD statements is great tho.

This could also be related to any needed re-shoots for Episode VIII. Suppose the General’s dialog doesn’t match the scene anymore or some other detail is amended and they need to modify her performance.

In The Hangover II they did a cameo with Liam Neeson that ended up needing to be reshot and he wasn’t available, so

This is by far my favorite response yet to the “...but Clinton!” crowd.

I shall be ctrl+c and ctrl+v’ing this, without attribution, but I wanted you to know I appreciated it.

Setting a timer when cooking (or anything needing a timer), having your streaming music selected then connected to a bluetooth speaker by speaking (no buttons), answering inane questions, making purchases from Amazon (its exceptionally good if you’ve ever ordered the item before).

I was very much in the “no role in my

So noble for you to come rescue Mr. Curtin.

I’d direct you to read the actual report, wherein they explain why direct evidence would expose operatives and operations, and then feel free to come back and lecture me on why you’re right and I’m buying into the lame-stream-medias.

Your entire “rebuttal” is obviously

Also, since I have so far refrained from citing the report, let me offer my opening salvo of citation:

“Moscow’s use of disclosures during the US election was unprecedented, but its influence campaign otherwise followed a longstanding Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber

What do you define as “hard evidence”?