The digital release cost cheaper than physical release. SO if you want to release it for digital, you have to pay the equivalent cost for physical.
The digital release cost cheaper than physical release. SO if you want to release it for digital, you have to pay the equivalent cost for physical.
It is cheaper to rate a digital only game. The issue is that the ESRB is afraid someone might start with digital just to avoid paying the fees when it comes to reatil.
That’s what people fail to grasp. ESRB isn’t going to enforce something just because a subset of gamers do not like it. That opens a can of worms like you said with trading cards.
ESRB is simply taking the place of a government agency. Companies would rather have a private organization rate games than have the U.S government agency do it. Stores and platform holders don’t deal with any fallout of having to sell any unrated game that might have any bad shit.
Microtransactions is not the reason why DSpace 3 was a bad game. It didn’t help the game, but it didnt hurt the game as much as you hope. It was still a bad game with or without it.
Not really a joke here is why. The comment I responded was posted within 6 minutes of this article going live. There is no way said person could have read this whole thing within 6 minutes. It seems to me, the comment was a extra long FUCK EA, the cheap and easy joke. EA has a part to play, EA mistake was properly…
You honestly did not read this article. How can you be so wrong about every single detail. My god, just read it. It is an interesting piece.
Then maybe fix your own title, it seems to imply you are going by the usual fuck EA which in this case is not true. EA had a hand, but it wasn’t EA that hanged itself.
What difference would that make if they already fucked up Dead Space 3?
Your post should read. “I did not read the article.” Were you in a competition to post something?
If you associate with a group whose platform is essentially misogynist with a slice of racism, don’t go whine when get lump together. Yes, the founder of GAF turned out to be a shithead and that sucks. It still doesn’t say a thing about the other members/mods. The mods were always far more active on that site than the…
Something similar to Janice in The Sopranos. You had all this people calling Janice a piece of shit, which she is, but then say she is the most vileperson in the show, while ignoring all the mobster.
You are 100% wrong. The whole point of marriage is for the man and woman to become Voltron.
Not really. It has always been this way see of the -ism that exist. The internet just made it easier to hide about it.
I’m reading that some of the brass at Komen have some fairly conservative politics. Hm.
For someone who is telling others to look into Komen, maybe follow your own advice. You seem to enjoy parading the agenda of someone far more clever than you. Do your own research and see how wrong you are.
Beyond my pay grade. I know as much as you do.
Come on. It literally takes 2 minutes to find out the truth. Don’t be stupid.
I dont think there is anything wrong. The issue here is that a lot of uninformed people seem to have read about the Komen Foundation giving only 21% of their revenue to fighting breast cancer and latching onto it. Mostly the same types that are easy pickings for fake news.
Please explain to us unknowledgeable folks why the Komen Foundation is pretty garbage. I have heard a lot of misconception, did my own research and to me they don’t seem to be that bad. And please don’t spit out the 21% dedicated to research number.