Why do you insist on writing like a 12-year-old who has just discovered compound-complex sentences?

How the fuck did this article get posted with not a single picture of the subject matter in it?

Hush you. You should know that logic is not permitted here.

I’d really like to see the breakdown between automation and human effort in that productivity rocket. I’m willing to bet that timeline coincides nicely with increased automation rather than a dramatic uptick in human productivity.

God damn it! I knew something was fishy. I wrote a check to her Alzheimer’s foundation and my grandma still died of Alzheimer’s.

Heh. “One of the largest web browsers is going to disable one of our revenue streams! Here’s why you should be afraid...”

Who is this “we” and “our” you keep referring to in the article? Is it Rhett who has a problem with this? Gizmodo staff? Univision? It reads like someone else wrote this.

Unfortunately, the company’s adblocking effort gets far more problematic, as our greatest concern is now coming to fruition:

I can’t imagine this is an unbiased article since gizmodo and its family of sites all use those GARBAGE ads that Google is against/blocking. I’m not sad that you’ll have to find advertisers that don’t do obnoxious shit like this.

No, Rhett, here’s why YOU should be worried.

Read: Gizmodo Media Group will have to pick a different, less fucking annoying advertising strategy.

Way to bury the lede. It was 1-1 until Metz went down to 10 men.

Nah, I’m not famous and don’t have a wikipedia page about myself. If I did I’d link to that as well showing you I’m not in the .1% of my profession (if that was even possible).

Forrest Whitaker would like a word...

It’s the whole premise of purposely taking a bad take and being earnest about it and that in and of itself being funny, not the actual material. Unfortunately, satire only works when it’s good.

He only has one post; he just keeps changing the title…

hell yeah......that’s why i watch sportscenter......standings...i fuckin love to wait 20 minutes to see a static image of something i can also find by googling “baswba;; standibgs” while on the treadmill without breaking stride

Understandable. It is just like when they pulled Hannah Storm from announcing New Orleans Saints games in 2005.

It was cool how you found a way to diminish the idiocy of ESPN’s decision while blaming those reporting the change for the reaction it caused. Very adept. This site’s ability to discern who gets the benefit of the doubt and who doesn’t is never surprising.

I NEVER complain out things like “PC culture” and whatnot, but honestly this is some horsecrap. No harm done, but really fucking stupid.